Trump: US First, Global Conflict? Approved! Change ‘Gulf of Mexico’ to ‘Gulf of America’

### Trump’s Executive Order on Place Name Changes: Understanding the Background and Impact

Former U.S. President Donald Trump's major executive order, enacted upon his inauguration on January 20, 2025, has become a hot topic. This executive order, particularly concerning changes to geographical place names in the United States, is at the center of controversy. Let's summarize and organize the details below.

1. Summary of Key Points

(1) Change 'Gulf of Mexico' to 'Gulf of America'

Background:
- The Gulf of Mexico is a large body of water bordering the United States and mainland Mexico, adjacent to five southern U.S. states.
- President Trump declared that the name "Gulf of Mexico" was inappropriate as it did not represent the interests of the U.S., and pushed for a name change.
- The primary motivation for the name change is analyzed as a strategic move to expand U.S. influence in Latin America.
Impact:
- Diplomatic Fallout: It is highly likely to cause a rift in relations with Mexico. The Mexican government may view the name change as a "territorial and cultural insult."
- Domestic Policy: Within the U.S., it is seen both as a symbol of "America First" and a controversy over the erosion of regional identity.

(2) Change Denali Mountain → Mount McKinley

Historical Background:
- Denali (6,194m altitude) is the highest peak in North America, located in southern Alaska, and has long been known by its indigenous name, "Denali."
- However, in the late 19th century, it was named "Mount McKinley" after the 25th U.S. President William McKinley, and restored to its original name during the Obama administration in 2015.
Trump's Policy Direction:
- President Trump changed it back to Mount McKinley, arguing it was "part of instilling patriotism to honor President McKinley's achievements, who led US industrialization, and to withdraw the request of indigenous people.”
Controversies and Significance:
Indigenous Opposition: Strong opposition from local voters and indigenous groups is anticipated. This could be seen as an act disregarding cultural sensitivities.
Emphasis on Conservative Identity: Trump's actions are seen as an attempt to restore traditional American values in order to rally conservative voters.

2. Background and Analysis

(1) Connection to America First

President Trump's inaugural address included the ambition to "make America the greatest, most powerful, and respected nation in the world."
This is interpreted as an intention to assert global hegemony and push forward a U.S.-centric agenda, beyond simply changing names.

(2) Political Effects

Strengthening the Conservative Base: Reinforcing the conservative support base by emphasizing traditional American values.
Potential for International Controversy: There is the potential for diplomatic issues as it may lead to discontent among Latin American and indigenous communities.

3. Anticipated Criticisms and Reactions

(1) International Community

Potential for strained relations with Mexico and other Latin American countries.
This executive order is likely to negatively impact the U.S.’s diplomatic image.

(2) Domestic Opposition

Alaskan Indigenous People: The renaming of Denali could cause significant cultural controversy.
Progressive Groups and Environmental Organizations: These measures from the Trump administration may be seen as actions that deepen national division.

4. Keywords for SEO Optimization

Trump executive order, Gulf of Mexico name change, Gulf of America, Denali Mountain, Mount McKinley, U.S. place name changes, U.S. conservative politics, Donald Trump policy, America First, international diplomatic conflicts

5. Conclusion

President Trump's executive order on place name changes is not just a minor policy, but a case that reveals his political intentions to emphasize American identity and patriotism. However, this may lead to international relations issues, as well as domestic cultural conflicts, which may require ongoing discussions in the future.

*Source URL:
https://news.nate.com/view/20250122n00542

Let's take a detailed look at the executive orders and foreign policy changes that former President Trump has pursued since taking office. I'll cover the direction and background of key policies, as well as international reactions, so take your time to read.

1. Trump Administration’s Executive Orders: Core Content and Structure

President Trump signed approximately 70 executive orders immediately after taking office, clearly demonstrating his policy direction. These included border issues, withdrawal from international agreements, and an “America First” foreign policy. Let’s break down the main points.

1.1 Border Issues and Immigration Policy

From the beginning of his administration, the Trump administration focused on strengthening border security. Let’s look at this in more detail:

Resumption of Border Wall Construction: By continuing to build a border wall along the border with Mexico, they demonstrated a commitment to stopping illegal immigration and smuggling issues.
Anti-Immigration Measures: Judging that the previous Biden administration had taken a lenient stance toward immigrants, they made immigration restriction policies and accelerating deportations their main strategy.

1.2 Reaffirmation of “America First”

President Trump’s inaugural address and his executive orders reflect the “America First” policy stance. This stance was strongly pursued during Trump’s first term, but this time it was implemented more intensely.

Panama Canal Issue: Trump showed his intention to strengthen the economic monopoly by making statements aimed at restoring the Panama Canal under U.S. control.
Centralization of the Gulf of Mexico: He emphasized the message that he would focus on prioritizing U.S. interests and achieving national interests.

2. Shift in Foreign Policy: Impact on the International Community

Since his re-election, Trump has questioned the U.S.’s international position and declared withdrawal from various international agreements and organizations. This was a key part of his vision of “American independence” and “utilization of domestic resources.”

2.1 Withdrawal from International Organizations and Termination of Treaties

Key examples of Trump’s push to distance himself from the international community include:

Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement: He declared withdrawal again from the Paris Climate Agreement, which the Biden administration had rejoined. This was based on the argument that it was a burden on the U.S. economy and industry.
Withdrawal from the WHO (World Health Organization): Contrary to the Biden administration, which emphasized the need for effective international cooperation through the WHO in the midst of the COVID pandemic, he formalized withdrawal from the WHO again. This was due to Trump’s own perception that the WHO was operating to the disadvantage of the United States.

2.2 Redesignation of Cuba as a State Sponsor of Terrorism

Trump reversed the Biden administration’s decision to remove Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. This is interpreted as Trump’s intention to decisively organize diplomatic relations with Cuba. Through this, we can see his intention to strengthen anti-communist policies and the position of the United States.

3. Meaning of “Stronger America First”

Trump’s executive orders and policies aim to overturn some existing practices and make the U.S. a “independent and autonomous” nation once again. Instead of the multilateralism and international cooperation pursued by the previous Biden administration, he focused on policies directly related to the U.S. economy and security.

However, while this approach gained support from conservative supporters within the U.S., it was also criticized in the international community for being overly centered on its own country under the banner of “America First.”

4. Implications of Trump’s Policies for Us

Trump’s policies have both advantages and disadvantages. Domestically, the strong stance may give some citizens reassurance, but externally, there is a risk that the framework for international cooperation could be weakened. The important thing is that it can create tension even among U.S. allies.