Housing Market Polarization Intensifies: Act Now!

● Housing Divide: Policy Blunder?

Real Estate Changes Caused by Government Policies and Land Issues, Increased Polarization, and New Phase of Asset Market

The Emergence of Land Transaction Permit Zones and Their Impact on the Real Estate Market

The government’s land transaction permit zone policy is emerging as a hot card issue in the 2025 real estate market.
Until the beginning of this year, attention was focused on other variables such as the base interest rate, but land regulation has suddenly become the center of controversy.
Along with regulations on multiple home owners, it is significantly restricting the sale of properties in some areas such as Gangnam and Apgujeong, and although it has a temporary effect on stabilizing housing prices, it forms an uncertain market sentiment in the long term.
In addition, the situation in which homeowners cannot put their properties on the market due to transaction restrictions is also occurring, raising concerns about hindering asset liquidity.

Gangnam vs. Regional Areas: Real Estate Price Fluctuations and Polarization Issues

Gangnam and some other areas in Seoul are showing continuous price increases, but sales transactions are contracting due to policy regulations.
On the other hand, the psychology of regional asset holders moving to Gangnam after selling their assets is strengthening, and the polarization between Seoul and regional areas is becoming increasingly clear.
Past cases of Gangnam apartment price crashes and the current purchase restrictions and regulatory contradictions imply that price formation is already abnormal, which increases the risk of the asset market.
If economic forecasts and government policies are not properly reflected, asset inequality is bound to widen further.

Short-Term vs. Mid- to Long-Term: Possibilities of Real Estate Market Transition and Response Challenges

In the short term, there is a possibility of price adjustments in some areas of Gangnam along with discussions on lifting land regulations, but volatility is increasing due to already decreased demand in Gangnam and the holding of properties in regional areas.
In the mid- to long-term, the polarization problem is expected to worsen unless proactive countermeasures are taken, such as government regulations on multiple home owners, strengthening regional competitiveness, and creating quality jobs.
In addition, considering that people’s perceptions and actual asset transactions do not always match in the real estate market, attention should be paid to the basic principles of supply and demand rather than predictions based on policy changes.
Ultimately, the possibility that Gangnam apartment prices will fall and regional asset prices will rise is gradually being realized, and the gap between the two regions may narrow, which should also be taken into account.

Government Policies and Asset Market Instability: The Need for the Government’s Role and Social Efforts

Currently, it is observed that the government, the National Assembly, and social organizations are all failing to come up with active solutions to land regulations and asset polarization problems.
Continuous policy instability risks further exacerbating the already tilted market balance.
In this situation, fundamental changes for regulating multiple home owners and revitalizing regional areas, and the government’s leading response efforts are urgently needed.
Key SEO keywords such as economic outlook, real estate, polarization, government policy, and asset market are emerging as urgent issues, and comprehensive measures to resolve market anxiety and protect asset values are absolutely necessary.

< Summary >
The introduction of land regulations by the government is expected to have a major impact on the real estate market in 2025.
Concerns about price differences between Gangnam and regional areas, asset market instability, and polarization problems are growing.
In the short term, sales transactions are contracting due to regulatory effects, but in the mid- to long-term, there is a possibility of Gangnam price adjustments and regional asset price increases.
The government and society must take comprehensive measures such as regulations on multiple home owners and strengthening regional competitiveness.

[Related Articles…]
Latest Trends in Land
Analysis of Polarization Status

*YouTube Source: [경제 읽어주는 남자(김광석TV)]

– 부동산 양극화, 어디까지 갈까? “정부 정책이 더 큰 혼란 만들었다” | 부동산 100분토론 3편

● U.S.A. – Loses-to-China, Chess-Game

World Economic Outlook: Key Issues such as Trade Wars, Trump Policies, and Post-COVID Supply Chain Restructuring

1. Trump’s Tariff Policy and IT Components – Core Issues of the Trade War

Tariff increases are not just about collecting taxes but are a strategy for reviving U.S. manufacturing and stabilizing the supply chain.
Tensions between the two countries seem to be easing with the tariff exemptions or deferrals on IT components, smartphones, and semiconductor parts.
The tariff moratorium on Apple iPhones and PCs contributes to easing the burden on U.S. consumers and increasing China’s export profits.
In this process, key keywords such as economic outlook, trade war, Trump, China, and IT components are intertwined.

2. The United States and China – A Chicken Game in the Trade War

The United States and China are in a chicken game situation, repeating concessions and counterattacks, aiming for a fatal blow to each other.
Tariff increases on Chinese products burden U.S. consumers in the short term and have ripple effects on various industries in the U.S.
Conversely, U.S. imports affect the overall Chinese domestic industry, raising concerns about pressure on the overall economy.
The tariff increase is not just a matter of 10% or 25%, but the relative scale of damage may vary due to the difference in physical strength between the countries.

3. Post-COVID U.S. Supply Chain Restructuring and the Will to Revive Manufacturing

As the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 revealed supply chain vulnerabilities, the U.S. is moving to reduce its dependence on overseas components.
The Biden administration’s IRA bill and Trump’s hard-line tariff policy are ultimately two aspects of achieving U.S. manufacturing revival and supply chain independence.
Both governments’ policies are based on the will to strengthen advanced factories and key component production in the U.S.
This process may lead to a short-term consumption slump, but it can be seen as a measure to seek economic recovery and stability in the long term.

4. Future Prospects and Strategies – Need for Diversification and Easing Consumer Burden

The U.S. is trying to diversify its production base to third countries such as India and Vietnam to reduce its dependence on China.
All tariff increases can affect the entire economy, leading to higher consumer prices, decreased sales, and the search for alternatives.
In particular, there is a risk that the difference in national strength will be highlighted as the competition structure of low value-added industries such as Southeast Asia changes.
Therefore, beyond the simple tariff issue, it is necessary to re-examine the overall economic structure and supply chain stability.

5. Conclusion – The Other Side of the Trade War and U.S. Economic Strategy

Trump’s tariff policy aimed not only at securing immediate tax revenue but also at the long-term revival of U.S. manufacturing.
The fact that both the United States and China are dependent on each other highlights that complete separation (decoupling) is practically difficult.
The trade war ultimately increases the burden on consumers and is likely to lead to slower economic growth.
Therefore, each country must seek a compromise with the other party while pursuing supply chain independence and diversification strategies.

The U.S. tariff increase started with Trump’s policy changes on major items such as IT components and smartphones.
The trade war with China is like a chicken game, repeating concessions and counterattacks, and it is returning as a burden to U.S. consumers.
Since the COVID-19 crisis, the U.S. has been spurring the revival of manufacturing along with the IRA bill to ensure supply chain stability.
In the future, the U.S. needs to pursue diversification strategies such as India and Vietnam to reduce its dependence on China, while solving the problems of short-term consumption slump and economic burden.

*YouTube Source: [와이스트릿 – 지식과 자산의 복리효과]

– 치긴게임에서 미국이 중국을 이길 수 없는 치명적인 3가지 이유 / 김태홍 대표 (1부)

● Russia-Ukraine War: Global Earthquake Imminent

Economic Outlook and International Situation Analysis Amid Escalating Tensions in Europe and Russia

1. The Boundary Formed Between Europe and Russia

Recently, it feels like an insurmountable boundary has been formed between Europe and Russia.

Europe is showing a united front against Russia, heavily influenced by the United States.

This movement is affecting the global economy as a whole, acting as a major variable in the economic outlook.

2. U.S.-Led Policies and Their Aftermath

Europe’s involvement in the anti-Russia structure advocated by the U.S. has resulted in concentrated damage.

The influence of the U.S. has significantly impacted security and foreign policy.

From an economic outlook perspective, these shifts are acting as destabilizing factors in the global economy.

3. Economic Impact and Internal Instability

Economic damage in the context of conflict is particularly manifesting as social problems, such as youth unemployment in Europe.

Increased unemployment rates are likely to trigger negative outcomes such as political instability and social uprisings.

This is a key factor affecting not only the economic outlook but also political stability.

4. Strategy to Resolve Internal Problems Through War

Historically, war has been used as a means to divert internal grievances into conflict with an external enemy.

Current European regimes may also consider extreme measures such as armed conflict to resolve internal and external instability.

Such choices will have profound repercussions on the global economy and international situation in the long term.

5. International Rivalries and Their Implications

Complex political strategies are unfolding, including the long-standing rivalry between Japan and Russia, and South Korea’s suspension of lethal weapon support to Ukraine.

These international situations act as important variables in war, policy, and diplomacy, directly and indirectly affecting the economic outlook.

As the world’s leading economic outlook expert, it is necessary to closely examine the interactions between the U.S., Europe, and Russia.

6. Future Outlook and Comprehensive Analysis

The widening gap between Europe and Russia is expected to have various impacts on the global economy.

Changes in existing diplomatic and economic policies are expected, and internal/external destabilizing factors may increase.

The possibility of attempting to resolve problems through extreme measures such as war cannot be ruled out.

Strategic responses are needed focusing on key keywords such as economic outlook, global economy, U.S., Europe, and Russia.

Summary

An insurmountable boundary has been formed between Europe and Russia.

U.S.-led policies are causing significant damage to Europe, leading to increased youth unemployment and internal instability.

Strategies to resolve internal problems through war are being discussed, and global economic developments and the economic outlook are greatly affected within the context of international rivalries.

[Related Posts…]

*YouTube Source: [달란트투자]

– 코앞으로 다가온 러우전쟁 충격 결말, 전세계에 상상못한 지각변동 온다｜진재일 교수 3부