Tesla BYD Collision Deleted Truth Earnings Shock Controversy

● BYD-Tesla Feud, Deleted Truth, Earnings Review Fury

Tesla vs BYD Electric Vehicle Comparison: Unveiling the Truth About Controversy, Technology, and Price

1. Introduction of Carwow Channel and Controversy

The video is content released on Carwow, a popular UK automotive YouTube channel that was launched in 2014.
Carwow has approximately 1.2 million subscribers and provides various automotive information, including new car reviews and drag races.
In particular, the host, Matt, conducts key reviews based on over 20 years of experience as an automotive journalist.
This video, released on April 17th U.S. time, compares the Tesla Model Y and the BYD Seal Lion.
From the introduction of the video, it highlights the competition between American and Chinese electric vehicles, simultaneously raising viewer interest and skepticism.

2. Performance and Technology Comparison

Both vehicles are the latest 2025 mid-size electric family SUVs.
The BYD Seal Lion has an output of approximately 530 horsepower, a torque of 690N, and weighs 2,420kg.
In contrast, the Tesla Model Y Dual Motor Long Range has 507 horsepower, a torque of 494N, and a body weight approximately 400kg lighter than the BYD.
In a quarter-mile (approximately 400m) race, the BYD starts faster, but the Tesla wins at the finish line with a time of 12.4 seconds, a difference of 0.4 seconds.
The analysis suggests that differences in weight and acceleration significantly impact performance.

3. Interior and Convenience Comparison

Carwow highly praised the BYD’s exterior, leather seats, and luxurious interior design, including the manually adjustable steering wheel.
In particular, they highlighted the strength of the BYD’s head-up display, which is equipped with functions comparable to those of internal combustion engine vehicles.
On the other hand, Tesla provides overall automated convenience with the introduction of a new screen.
The rear seat designs of both vehicles were also compared, but this can be interpreted as an evaluation based on personal preference.

4. Trunk Capacity and Battery Performance Comparison

Tesla has a trunk capacity of 854L, while the BYD has 520L, meaning Tesla can carry approximately 64.2% more cargo.
The battery capacity of the BYD is 91.3kWC (or 33kWC), while the Tesla Model Y Long Range is compared at 75kWC.
Theoretically, the BYD has an advantage in battery capacity, but in actual driving distance, Tesla surpasses the BYD with 568km (353 miles) compared to the BYD’s 502km (312 miles).
In other words, Tesla can travel 13% farther with a 21.73% smaller battery, demonstrating superior efficiency.
Consequently, Tesla shows an advantage in energy efficiency, thermal management, and powertrain efficiency.

5. Price Comparison and Market Strategy

In the UK, the Tesla Model Y All-Wheel Drive Long Range is priced at approximately £51,990 (approximately ₩97 million).
The BYD is priced at £59,000 (approximately ₩111 million), making it approximately 13% more expensive than the Tesla.
Considering various factors such as price, performance, driving range, and trunk capacity, Tesla is generally a more competitive choice.
However, BYD can showcase different appeal in the market by leveraging its low production costs and price competitiveness based on Chinese labor.

6. Final Conclusion and Editing Controversy

After a 25-minute comparative review, the video acknowledges impressive aspects of both sides, but ultimately concludes that the Tesla Model Y is the winner.
However, the initial video caused significant controversy due to violent editing and excessive ending expressions (depicting Tesla owners as “crazy” people).
After the removal of a shocking 13-second scene, an attempt was made to explain it as an editorial error, but the Tesla community criticized it as an evasion of responsibility without an official apology.
Similar cases, such as suspected editing manipulation in Marco Robo’s videos, have emerged, where specific information is intentionally omitted or highlighted, negatively impacting brand image.
In particular, this comparative video was released just before Tesla’s Q1 earnings announcement, raising concerns that it could affect market and investor sentiment.

<Summary>

The performance, interior, battery efficiency, trunk capacity, and price of Tesla and BYD electric vehicles are carefully compared in chronological order.
The Tesla Model Y shows superiority in terms of light body, efficient battery, and large trunk capacity.
The BYD stands out with its luxurious interior and exterior design, but is at a disadvantage in terms of price and efficiency.
The video editing controversy and information omission issues have caused significant backlash from the Tesla community.
This incident is likely to receive widespread attention through top SEO keywords such as the global automotive market, electric vehicles, economic news, automotive reviews, and the automotive market.

[Related Articles…]
Latest Tesla News
BYD Market Analysis

*YouTube Source: [오늘의 테슬라 뉴스]

– BYD가 이긴 것은 조작 ?! 삭제된 13초의 진실, 테슬라 vs BYD 리뷰에 분노 폭발! 테슬라 택한 당신은 미쳤다 ? 영상 원본 공개! 어닝 전 나온 부정리뷰 진실은?

● KOSPI 5000, Corporate Law Overhaul

Summary of Key Points: KOSPI Recovery Prospects, Amendments to the Commercial Act, and Preventing Value Depreciation

1. The Importance of KOSPI Targets and Increasing National Healthy Assets

Emphasizing that the promise to surpass KOSPI 5,000 is not a mere slogan but a path to increasing national assets through recovery and growth.
Lee Jae-myung’s reference to ‘healthy asset growth’ aims to efficiently increase assets by utilizing the stock market instead of real estate.
Analyzing the reasons why past targets such as KOSPI 4,000 and 5,000 were not realized and the differentiating factors of this message.
If the stock market is healthily activated, the public can easily increase their assets, which positively impacts global economic competitiveness.
From an economic outlook perspective, KOSPI recovery will serve as a pillar for the overall South Korean economy.

2. Clearly Understanding the Differences Between Amendments to the Commercial Act, Directors’ Duty of Loyalty, and Duty of Care

The key point of the recent amendments to the Commercial Act is the ‘director’s duty of loyalty to shareholders’.
It is important to note that the duty of care and the duty of loyalty are different.
For example, conflicts of interest between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders may arise in the process of mergers, spin-offs, dividends, and investment decisions.
The duty of loyalty is not a simple management judgment but an issue where the director must directly prove their judgment when conflicts arise between shareholders.
Properly reflecting the amendments to the Commercial Act can reduce unnecessary litigation risks regarding directors’ business decisions, contributing to transparent global economic activity.

3. Core Strategies for Preventing Value Depreciation and Shareholder Returns

Preventing value depreciation is more important than just emphasizing value enhancement.
Considering that the company’s shareholders are the real owners, corporate value declines if management retains substantial funds and fails to properly implement shareholder returns.
In fact, there are cases where a decrease in the shareholder return rate lowers ROE (Return on Equity), reducing investment attractiveness and lowering market evaluation.
From the perspective of economic outlook and investment strategy, it should be clear that shareholder return policies are key to restoring corporate value.
This perspective is an important point as it directly affects global economic competitiveness.

4. KTNG Case Study: Management’s Shareholder Returns and Internal Conflicts

At KTNG, the value depreciation phenomenon is prominent because management fails to properly perform its board of directors role.
Conflicts of interest between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders arise within the company due to spin-offs and mergers.
In particular, the case where the KTNG Welfare Foundation, Scholarship Foundation, Welfare Fund, and Employee Stock Ownership Association act as major shareholders and gifts of treasury stocks worth 1 trillion KRW are made raises questions.
As such, if management focuses on internal interests rather than shareholder returns, stock price declines and corporate value losses are inevitable in the long term.
Strengthening the director’s duty of loyalty through amendments to the Commercial Act will play a key role in solving this problem.

5. Coway: Analysis of Ownership Changes, ROE, and Shareholder Return Issues

Coway has undergone dynamic changes as ownership has changed from Woongjin, MBK, Woongjin, to Netmarble.
Coway, which recorded a high PER (18-30x) in 2012, saw its PER plummet to the 7-10x level with changes in management strategy.
Despite boasting ample cash flow and high ROE, the problem is that ROE has fallen after the acquisition and the shareholder return rate has fallen from 90% to the 20% range.
As such, if a company excessively retains retained earnings, investors do not receive practical dividend benefits, and corporate value declines.
Looking at the case of CEO Bang Jun-hyuk, a structure is revealed where the interests of minority shareholders are sacrificed as management secures personal profits and high salaries.
This problem can also be solved if the duty of loyalty to shareholders is properly reflected in the amendments to the Commercial Act.

< Summary >
Through the analysis of increasing national assets through KOSPI recovery, clarifying the differences between directors' duty of loyalty and duty of care according to amendments to the Commercial Act, the importance of preventing value depreciation and shareholder return policies, and case studies of KTNG and Coway,

We re-examine the foundation for strengthening South Korea's economic outlook and global economic competitiveness.

Focusing on key keywords such as economic outlook, global economy, amendments to the Commercial Act, shareholder returns, and value depreciation, we examine how important corporate value recovery and transparent management are.

*YouTube Source: [이효석아카데미]

– [그냥효] 코스피 5,000 시대의 개막? 상법개정 총정리