TARIFF APOCALYPSE! PYONGYANG NIGHTMARE!

● Powell’s Trap, Trump’s Fury

Analysis of Trump’s Erroneous Tariffs and the Impact of the Global Economy and Trade War

1. Development of Tariff Imposition and Initial Scenarios

This article details the incident of President Trump’s implementation of unpredictable tariff policies and the resulting market shocks and side effects.
At the time, the Trump administration attempted to use a combination of reciprocal tariffs and universal tariffs.
Cabinet members and the Treasury Secretary proposed gradually increasing tariffs to minimize market instability.
However, on the day of the announcement, Trump ignored the existing scenario by imposing tariffs averaging 22%, which was unsustainable for the global economy.
This sudden action caused significant repercussions for the US economy, the global economy, and the trade war as a whole.

2. Market and National Reactions and Internal Side Effects

After the imposition of tariffs, the bond market plummeted and uncertainty increased.
Concerns about stagflation, rising interest rates, inflation, and debt issues revealed the contradictory aspects of US fiscal policy.
In particular, the 90-day reprieve on tariff policy, intended to increase negotiating power, instead exposed the internal contradictions and side effects of the United States.
Major allies such as Japan, South Korea, and China expressed vague distrust of the US tariff imposition method without specific demands.
As instability in the trade war intensified across the global economy, each country sought various countermeasures to protect its manufacturing and consumer markets.

3. Weakened Negotiation Power and Long-Term Prospects of the Trade War

The United States stood at a crossroads in negotiations, retreating from tariff impositions without any substantial gains in negotiations.
Initially, Trump expected to lower energy prices, stabilize prices, and lower Treasury bond rates, but the result was instead economic recession and reduced consumption.
The side effects of tariffs caused problems in various areas, including bonds, exchange rates, and consumer prices, increasing uncertainty in the global economy.
Ultimately, the United States is likely unable to escape the internal instability and vicious cycle of the trade war caused by tariff policies conducted independently without cooperation with allies.
Along with this, the structural contradictions and fiscal deficit problems of the US economy are expected to have a serious impact on future international trade and global economic stability.

4. Future Response Strategies and Implications

From the perspective of investors, attention should be paid to the rapid market volatility caused by excessive tariff impositions.
In the short term, the 90-day reprieve policy may be a signal for the resumption of negotiations, but no concrete results have yet emerged.
Each country must closely observe the incomplete negotiation proposals presented by the United States and pay close attention to the direction of global economic stability and fiscal policy.
The current situation is unfolding as a complex problem intertwined with various SEO keywords such as trade war, tariff issues, US finance, and global economic uncertainty.
In the future, when establishing overseas investment and market strategies, it is necessary to pay close attention to these uncertainties and the progress of international negotiations.

Summary

Trump’s excessive tariff impositions completely overturned the existing negotiation strategy, causing serious side effects on the US economy and the global economy as a whole.
With the bond market plummeting, interest rates rising, and instability in the trade war emerging, each country is paying attention to the resumption of negotiations and the contradictory fiscal policies of the United States.
Despite the retreat through the 90-day reprieve policy, the United States is likely to fall into internal contradictions and a vicious cycle of the trade war without concrete negotiation results.

*YouTube Source: [와이스트릿 – 지식과 자산의 복리효과]

– “파월은 패배자” 외통수에 몰린 트럼프의 분노…달러, 미국 증시 폭락하는데 국장은 버티는 더 무서운 이유 / 이선엽 이사 (풀버전)

● North Korea,Purge Fears

Global Economic Outlook: Analysis of Kim Jong-un’s Anti-Aircraft Investment and Crisis in People’s Livelihood

1. Military Infrastructure Investment and Establishment of Pyongyang’s Air Defense Network

Kim Jong-un is pouring a huge amount of money into building an air defense network in Pyongyang.
Analysis shows that more than 30,000 people have been mobilized in this process.
From Kim Jong-un’s point of view, he is focusing on maximizing military power by using the money that has come into the national treasury.
This massive budget is being used not only for Pyongyang’s air defense network but also for overall military infrastructure investment.

2. Crisis in People’s Livelihood and Problems with Government’s Fiscal Management

The burden on the national treasury due to military investment is having a major impact on the people’s livelihood.
In reality, voices are rising that the people’s livelihood is heading towards destruction due to inadequate government policies.
The people are upset about the increasing burden of essential living expenses and the poor social safety net.
The government’s focus on the military sector has negatively impacted the balance of economic management.

3. Compensation for Lives and Anger of Bereaved Families After Dispatch

In recent dispatch cases, even the minimum compensation for lives has not been properly provided.
Criticism is being raised that even when soldiers return from dispatch, there is no compensation for the dead soldiers.
There are continuous demands from bereaved families and society as a whole that the government should properly compensate for lives.
These controversies over dispatch and compensation are acting as a source of anxiety throughout society, as well as discontent within the military.

4. Future Economic Outlook and the Need for Government Policy Review

The current military investment and the crisis in people’s livelihood provide an opportunity to re-examine the government’s fiscal management methods.
As the domestic economic outlook is closely linked to the global economy, a balanced policy is essential.
Top economic experts analyze that the right strategic balance must be found between military budget investment and support for the people’s livelihood.
The choices the government makes between economic stabilization and military investment in the future will determine the nation’s future.

Recently, Kim Jong-un has invested a massive budget in the construction of Pyongyang’s air defense network, mobilizing more than 30,000 people.
Due to this military investment, the people’s livelihood is facing a serious crisis, and public discontent is increasing due to the government’s inadequate compensation for lives and controversies over compensation after dispatch.
For the future economic outlook, the government must re-examine the balance of fiscal management and policies in line with global economic trends.
Key issues include top-level, global economy, dispatch, people’s livelihood, and economic outlook.

*YouTube Source: [달란트투자]

– 처음 뜬 북한군 반란 신호. 지금 완전 살벌한 평양 분위기⎮강철환 대표 풀버전1