Battery War Korea Overtakes China Bitcoin Trumps Secret

● Battery Hegemony: Korea’s Last Stand

Global Economic Outlook: Future Analysis of Secondary Battery and Battery Industry

1. China’s Leading Strategy and Technological Gap

China is dominating the battery industry by raising its secondary battery market share to the global level.
It is securing market leadership with products that have safety and economic efficiency, such as lithium iron phosphate batteries, as well as technology development.
We will clearly examine why Korean and Japanese ternary batteries are losing out in the market compared to Chinese lithium iron phosphate batteries.
The Chinese government’s policy of supporting domestic electric vehicles is spreading to the global market, greatly affecting the supply chain competition structure of the US-China hegemonic war.

2. Current Status and Challenges of All-Solid-State Battery Technology

All-solid-state batteries are technologies that maximize safety by replacing the liquid electrolyte of existing lithium-ion batteries with a solid.
It is attracting attention as an innovative technology through the removal of flammable substances amid growing safety concerns.
Currently, there are difficulties in commercialization due to technical perfection and economic feasibility issues, but research and development (R&D) for performance improvement and cost reduction are actively underway.
All-solid-state batteries have great potential to grow as next-generation energy storage solutions in relation to the global economic outlook.

3. US-China Hegemonic War and Changes in the Global Supply Chain

The US-China trade war is affecting the entire secondary battery and battery industry ecosystem, making supply chain restructuring inevitable.
China secures strategic advantages by dominating the global market in core materials (lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, etc.) and processing sectors.
In particular, China’s dominance in the rare earth processing sector is a major burden for Western countries such as the United States and Europe.
Domestic companies and governments must establish a safe supply chain in the midst of the US-China hegemonic war by investing in production infrastructure and strengthening R&D capabilities.

4. Future Strategy: Technology Development and Ecosystem Reorganization

In the global economic outlook, Korea needs to focus on specific technology fields in order to maintain competitiveness in secondary battery technology and the battery industry.
We must close the technological gap and secure unique technological capabilities through R&D investment and talent development.
In order to reorganize the domestic ecosystem, the government and companies must cooperate to strengthen the domestic supply chain of materials, processing, and finished battery products.
When entering overseas markets, it is important to pursue strategic overseas investments targeting major electric vehicle markets such as the United States and Europe.

5. Conclusion: A Turning Point to Turn the Current Situation into an Opportunity

The secondary battery and battery industry is intertwined with global political and economic issues beyond simple technology competition.
In a reality where China’s proactive investment and government-led policies are dominating the market, Korea must increase its competitiveness through technology development and ecosystem expansion.
If next-generation technologies such as all-solid-state batteries succeed in commercialization, they are expected to become the main players in the future energy market with both safety and efficiency.
Strategic response and innovation will be the key to survival and advancement amid the variables of the US-China hegemonic war.

Summary

China is leading the global market in the secondary battery and battery industry with domestic electric vehicle support and lithium iron phosphate battery technology.
All-solid-state battery technology increases safety by converting liquid electrolyte into solid, but economic improvement is needed.
The US-China hegemonic war is reorganizing the core material supply chain, requiring strengthened cooperation between the government and companies.
Korea must secure unique competitiveness in specific technology fields through R&D investment and talent development, and respond to the global market through domestic ecosystem reorganization.
This strategic approach is expected to lead to innovation and growth across the energy industry in the future.

[Related Articles…]
All-Solid-State Battery Innovation |
US-China Hegemony Issues

*YouTube Source: [경제 읽어주는 남자(김광석TV)]

– 2차전지 패권 쟁탈전: 중국에 추월당한 한국, 반격 전략은 ‘단 하나’ | 경읽남과 토론합시다 | 이시준 대표

● Trump’s Bitcoin Gambit – Decoding America’s Crypto Play

Cynthia Lummis Bill and Bitcoin Outlook, and U.S. Debt Management Strategy

1. Senator Cynthia Lummis’s New Bill Approach

Senator Cynthia Lummis proposes a method that can be implemented without tax usage or congressional consent.
The intention is to secure tax neutrality through bills that can be enacted without congressional approval.
This doesn’t completely conflict with President Trump’s executive orders; rather, it feels like approaching it in a complementary manner.

2. Specific Approach to Bill Contents and Operational Methods

The bill is structured to utilize existing tax policies while also preparing alternative measures.
It emphasizes maintaining tax neutrality while exploring methods that do not require congressional consent.
The focus is on ensuring the bill can proceed smoothly without friction with Congress under any circumstances.

3. BENE Research Report and Bitcoin Growth Prospects

Based on the BENE Research report, Bitcoin is projected to increase in price by 25% annually.
If the U.S. government holds 1 million Bitcoins by 2029, U.S. government debt could reach $36 trillion.
Based on Bitcoin’s rapid growth rate, there is a prospect that the U.S. government can hedge national debt risk with Bitcoin as collateral.

4. Temporal Development of U.S. Debt and Bitcoin Holding Effects

It is projected that U.S. debt will reach $36 trillion by 2029 when 1 million Bitcoins are held.
By around 2050, the amount of Bitcoin held is expected to provide about 20% collateral capacity for national debt.
An additional 16 years later, it is possible that 1:1 collateral capability could be achieved due to the power of compound interest.
In other words, if the U.S. government stockpiles Bitcoin, it is expected to greatly help alleviate the debt burden in the long term.

5. Future Outlook and Ripple Effects on the Overall Economy

Assuming that the price of Bitcoin will rise much faster than gold, it could have a significant impact on national fiscal policy.
If major countries such as the U.S. government develop financial stabilization strategies through Bitcoin, repercussions are expected in the global economic outlook.
At the same time, this move will act as an important investment strategy for investors and is expected to bring significant changes to the overall flow of the economy.

Senator Cynthia Lummis presents a bill that can proceed without congressional consent through methods other than taxes.
Based on the BENE Research report, Bitcoin’s 25% annual growth outlook and the $36 trillion debt situation when the U.S. holds 1 million in 2029 are predicted.
By 2050, Bitcoin is expected to increase national debt collateral capacity to 20%, and up to a 1:1 collateral level after an additional 16 years.
This is expected to play an important role in financial stability and investment strategies in the U.S. and global economy, along with a higher growth rate than gold.
From a major economic perspective, SEO keywords such as Bitcoin, national debt, economic outlook, financial crisis, and investment strategies are naturally incorporated.

*YouTube Source: [달란트투자]

– 트럼프가 노리는 건 비트코인안에 숨긴 미국 속내 #오태민 #트럼프 #달러스테이블코인 #비트코인