Currency Shock: US Economy, Invest Local

·

·






Dollar Dives

Global Market Turbulence: Key Summary of the U.S. Credit Rating Downgrade and Economic Outlook for the Second Half of 2024

1. The Aftermath of the U.S. Credit Rating Downgrade and Global Market Reactions

– Despite concerns that the U.S. credit rating downgrade could trigger a global economic crisis, the overall market reaction has been surprisingly calm.
– The auction of 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds also underperformed expectations, but there was no extreme risk-aversion (panic) atmosphere like in the past.
– While the stock market weakened as U.S. interest rates (bond yields) rose, the market is gradually digesting the risks instead of experiencing a sharp decline.
– The market is accepting the end of the ‘U.S. Number One Era’ and responding with a realistic attitude rather than shock.

2. Dollar Weakness and Won Strength Forecast, Changes in Fair Exchange Rates

– The easing of the U.S. asset dominance can be interpreted as a positive signal for resolving global economic imbalances.
– As the U.S. authorities overtly signal a weaker dollar, the outlook for a stronger won is strengthening. The exchange rate is psychologically considering levels down to 1,200 won.
– There is a possibility of further won appreciation when calculating fair exchange rates, so now is the time if you were considering exchanging into won.

3. Changes in the Investment Environment for Global Export and Domestic Stocks

– The shift to a weaker dollar and a stronger won is unfavorable for export stocks (especially those benefiting from exchange rate gains) that have been booming.
– Within export stocks, only those capable of securing demand (such as shipbuilding, defense, cosmetics, etc.) are expected to differentiate themselves; the risks for the rest are expected to increase.
– The environment is becoming more favorable for domestic stocks to receive a windfall. It is important to discover items related to inbound tourism, beauty, casinos, duty-free, etc.
– Macro changes are also affecting bottom-up (stock-specific strategies), requiring diversification of investment ideas.

4. Changes in Korean Interest Rate Policy and Domestic Demand Boosting Effects

– As the won stabilizes, the possibility of the Bank of Korea lowering the base interest rate increases. This is expected to boost domestic demand.
– Interest rate cuts are favorable for domestic industries, and concerns about a sharp rebound in the exchange rate are not significant.
– Stock picking is essential for both export and domestic strategies.

5. Bitcoin’s New Highs, Investment Implications from a Long-Term Perspective

– Bitcoin reached a new high in 2024, rising from 50,000 won 15 years ago to the current 150 million won. Dramatic changes can be experienced with long-term investment.
– The limited supply of coins (21 million) highlights the attractiveness of long-term investment.
– The trend of digital assets becoming a major investment tool within the traditional financial system is strengthening.

6. Changes in U.S. Energy Policy (Solar and Nuclear) and Related Industry Outlook

– The Biden administration prematurely terminated tax credits for residential solar power, strengthening the regulatory environment. Stock prices of residential solar companies (such as Solar) have fallen.
– The Trump side is strengthening policies to boost nuclear power, and nuclear-related companies (Doosan Enerbility, Viernova, etc.) are rising.
– The global energy crisis is deepening, highlighting the limitations of renewable energy as a standalone solution and emphasizing the need for nuclear power in conjunction.
– Monitoring policy changes by industry is essential.

7. Next Week’s Schedule and Investment Strategy Checkpoints

– U.S. Consumer Confidence Index, Personal Income and Spending, and the May Price Index (PCE) are scheduled for release.
– Stock market volatility may increase depending on policy and indicator changes.
– In the era of interest rate cuts, a gradual adjustment phase rather than a U.S.-led panic is expected. Gradual rebalancing is more advantageous than aggressive betting.
– It is necessary to consider diversifying investments across asset classes such as global stocks, cryptocurrencies, and energy stocks.

< Summary >

  • Despite the U.S. credit rating downgrade and rising bond yields, the market is reacting more calmly than before.
  • The easing of U.S. asset dominance and the weaker dollar/stronger won suggest potential changes in the global economic structure.
  • The strength of export stocks is slowing, domestic stocks are rising, and domestic recovery is expected with interest rate cut policies.
  • The strength of digital assets such as Bitcoin remains, and checking policy directions by energy sector is key to investment.
  • It is necessary to strengthen gradual response and diversification strategies based on next week's economic indicators and policy announcements.

This analysis systematically covered key economic keywords such as U.S. credit rating downgrade, global economic outlook, exchange rate forecast, energy policy changes, and picking winners and losers among domestic/export stocks.
The latest issues such as U.S. bond yields driving market volatility, Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, won appreciation, and policy changes were analyzed in detail by group, making them immediately applicable to practical investment and understanding economic trends.
The analysis included key elements of the economic outlook for the second half of 2024, such as changes in major domestic and international interest rate policies, exchange rate trends, U.S. consumer indicator trends, stock analysis of energy-related sectors such as solar and nuclear power, and global asset diversification strategies.
Overall, the analysis emphasizes reduced uncertainty and the need for diversification and rebalancing of investment strategies in a phase of gradual adjustment.

[Related Articles…]

*YouTube Source: [이효석아카데미]


– [모라구효 특별 LIVE] 6개월 만에 환율 1,360원대 최저, 미국 정말 큰일 나는 걸까?




Trump’s Energy War, Korea’s Opportunity

A Comprehensive Overview of South Korea’s Energy Security, the Deep Sea Whale Controversy, the Trump Era’s Global Energy Hegemony, and Opportunities in the Shipbuilding Industry

1. The Deep Sea Whale Controversy: The Realistic Limitations and Misunderstandings of South Korea’s Oil Development

– This article provides a detailed explanation of why the Deep Sea Whale situation has not been trusted by domestic and international experts.
– It organizes the actual meanings and misunderstood parts of each oil development stage (geological survey → physical exploration → drilling → evaluation → production).
– It explains the fictitiousness of announcing ’14 billion barrels’ of resources and the real nuances of the 20% success probability.
– It compares the geological differences between actual foreign cases such as the United States, the Gulf of Mexico, and Guyana, and the East Sea of Korea in detail.

2. Misinformation and Policy Announcements, and the Background of Intentions

– It compares general and exceptional cases, explaining why the issue was brought up to the President’s announcement.
– It conveys the realistic context of the problems with the announcement revealed in the CEO’s interview, such as political intentions or the possibility of exaggerated announcements.
– It explains the error in the expression of a 20% exploration success rate and the impact of ‘hope torture’ on the national economic sentiment and policy promotion.

3. The Direction of South Korean Oil Exploration and Global Comparisons

– It provides practical explanations of the Korea National Oil Corporation’s actual exploration/evaluation experience, the lessons learned from failures, and examples of promising structures.
– It offers strategic and realistic suggestions: “Exploration is necessary, but false hope is forbidden, and a lottery-style approach is inefficient.”
– It explains the necessity of attracting foreign capital and consortiums and clears up misunderstandings about the controversy over the outflow of national wealth.

4. Trump’s Second Term and Global Energy Hegemony Strategy

– It explains the Trump administration’s ‘energy hegemony’ keynote: increasing shale gas production, reducing support for renewable energy, and a US-centered market strategy.
– It tracks the structure of the United States’ transformation into a net exporter and changes in the crude oil and LNG markets.
– It meticulously analyzes the balance of power between Trump’s “hegemony seizure vs. actual market dynamics,” including private capital, profitability, and OPEC/Russia production cuts.
– It explains the mechanism by which energy policy is linked to the grand purpose of price stability, leading to lower interest rates and US dominance.
– It summarizes the market responses of major oil-producing countries such as OPEC+ and Russia, and the economic repercussions of international oil price and energy price fluctuations.

5. Potential for US-Korea Cooperation in LNG Carriers and Shipbuilding: New Opportunities

– It explains the background of Trump’s remarks on shipbuilding cooperation and their relationship to LNG export strategies.
– It emphasizes the reality that “there are no exports without LNG carriers” and the strength of the Korean shipbuilding industry’s 70% market share.
– It provides detailed explanations of the Alaska LNG project, equity participation, and value chain opportunities in construction, engineering, and shipbuilding.
– It examines risk factors such as global energy oversupply, falling LNG prices, and Chinese competition.
– It offers specific suggestions on the need and direction of bold long-term investment, equity participation, and the establishment of an independent value chain.

6. Conclusion and Outlook: Sensible Response Strategies for the Korean Economy in a Changing Environment

– It emphasizes “strategic mid- to long-term approach instead of lottery-style expectations, utilization of international consortiums, and resource development based on trust and accuracy.”
– It is necessary to focus on maximizing the structural competitiveness of Korean industries such as LNG and shipbuilding in the balance of the external market.
– It presents a balanced view of the opportunities and risks that the Korean economy can have, focusing on the global energy supply-demand structure and economic keywords (energy security, oil prices, LNG, resource development, global competitiveness).


1. It summarizes the limitations of oil development revealed in the Deep Sea Whale controversy, announcement misunderstandings, and the perspectives of field experts.
2. It analyzes the economic impact of hope torture caused by problems with government announcements and exploration strategies, and exaggerated success rates.
3. It forecasts the US energy hegemony strategy in Trump’s second term, power games with major oil-producing countries such as OPEC, and actual market repercussions.
4. It organizes methods for capturing opportunities for the Korean industry in LNG and shipbuilding cooperation and suggests the necessity and strategy of long-term equity participation.

SEO Summary: Deep Sea Whale, Korean Energy Security, Trump Energy Hegemony, LNG Market, Global Competitiveness

A comprehensive analysis of South Korea’s energy security and the Deep Sea Whale controversy, the Trump era’s US energy hegemony strategy, and the future of shipbuilding (LNG carriers). Summarizes the reality of misunderstandings in oil development/exploration stages and errors in success rates, and the impact on the global market, and systematically organizes the value chain growth opportunities in the shipbuilding and energy sectors, strategic investment directions, and methods for maximizing global competitiveness.

[Related Articles…]

*YouTube Source: [경제 읽어주는 남자(김광석TV)]


– [풀버전] 트럼프발 에너지 패권 전쟁이 본격화된다. 한국에 새로운 기회가 열린다 | 경읽남과 토론합시다 | 양수영 박사




Lee Jun-seok, Economic Crisis, Stock Market, AI Era

2024 Presidential Candidate Lee Jun-seok, Summary of Economic and Investment Policy Q&A – Comprehensive Summary of Key Issues

Preview of Key Topics Covered in this Article

In this article, we will delve into the core arguments of economic policy, capital market policy, household debt and interest rates, corporate tax and decentralization, and complex economic issues such as inheritance tax and dividend/interest taxation, as directly revealed by 2024 presidential candidate Lee Jun-seok, with the actual context and sense of dialogue.
You can check at a glance the differences in context between politics and the economy, financial markets, potential growth rate and human capital issues, and considerations for the introduction and operation of each system.
At the end of the article, as a blogger who is sincere about the economy, I will fill it with my perspective, genuinely important points, and practical issue-specific tips.

Detailed Summary of Major Issues in Chronological Order

1. Presidential Candidate Lee Jun-seok’s Economic View: Risk-Taking and Pragmatism

– Mentioning his experience in economics education, he explains how many people overestimate risk, that is, how risk aversion works in real life such as insurance.
– Emphasizes the philosophy of ‘high risk, high return’ in life and policy. He introduces the background of choosing new challenges such as founding a party instead of a safe path as a politician.

2. Economic Revitalization and Fiscal Policy Direction

– Diagnoses the current state of the Korean economy, such as low growth, household debt (90-100% of GDP), and government debt (below 50%).
– Criticizes that continuous fiscal spending focused on welfare expansion is risky and evaluates that one-off supplementary budgets are necessary during economic downturns.
– Recognizes the long-term risk of fiscal burden and raises the need for fundamental prescriptions such as structural reforms rather than unsustainable welfare expansion.

3. Interest Rate Policy and Household Debt Measures

– Realistically diagnoses the burden on the younger generation/mortgage loans and expresses concern that if the base interest rate (interest rate) continues to rise, it could lead to a crisis in the real economy.
– Although it is not easy to lower interest rates due to concerns about the reverse in the US base interest rate, he emphasizes the need to implement realistic household support policies (e.g., proposing a ‘minimum 3-year grace period + extension upon childbirth’ for mortgage loans).
– Prefers policies that can reduce the actual burden while preventing moral hazard instead of simply forgiving debt.

4. Differentiated Corporate Tax and Minimum Wage by Region, Energy-Based Decentralization Strategy

– Emphasizes the need to strengthen the ‘local autonomous decision-making power’ for corporate tax, etc. to revitalize the local economy. He suggests changing the current national tax system so that local governments can freely decide about 30%.
– Emphasizes the need for Korea to differentiate its local development strategy, citing the corporate tax and minimum wage competition structure confirmed in major developed countries such as the US/Europe.
– In particular, in connection with the Distributed Energy Act, etc., he argues for ‘cost rationalization’ such as transmission costs when attracting power-intensive factories/industries near nuclear power plants.

5. Corporate Governance Reform (Commercial Act/Capital Market Act)

– Points out the discrepancy in interests between major shareholders and general shareholders and strongly argues for strengthening the rights of minority shareholders through amendments to the Commercial Act.
– Directly expresses the need to mandate treasury stock cancellation and amend the Commercial Act for major structural issues such as spin-offs and treasury stock issues.
– He summarizes that political intervention in companies (e.g., HMM headquarters relocation) is an unnecessary external pressure and that corporate autonomy + shareholder care management is the core value.
– Emphasizes only the minimum obligations such as corporate tax instead of applying ‘moral pressure’ to companies such as social contribution and employment.

6. Improvement of Inheritance/Gift Tax and Dividend/Interest Income Tax System

– He diagnoses that the current inheritance/gift tax (maximum 50-60%) burden has a strong double taxation character and only encourages realistic tax avoidance plans.
– He suggests that it should be reorganized into a real tax system such as conversion to capital acquisition tax/inheritance acquisition tax. He suggests that having many children is advantageous in terms of taxation and can solve the low birth rate effect.
– Regarding dividend/interest income tax (currently 49.5%), he supports the introduction of ‘separate taxation’ and argues that it is positive for dividend propensity and capital market investment activation.

7. Korea’s Growth Potential and Linkage with Education Policy

– Warns of the reality that the upward trend of human capital has stopped since the 1990s and the changes in labor being replaced by software and AI.
– Analyzes that nurturing top-level talent rather than simply ‘raising them not to spend’ is the key to recovering true growth potential.

8. Temperature Difference between Economic Policy and Politics and Issues Felt by the Public

– When the economy and growth rate are trending upward, the political impact is minimal, but the difference in results will be much more pronounced in a low-growth phase.
– Emphasizing the need for a complex strategy that combines short-term (supplementary budget) and medium- to long-term (structural reform), he repeatedly mentions the need for fundamental changes rather than immediate prescriptions.

SEO Summary for Economic Blogs

  • Key economic issues of the 2024 presidential election: Comprehensive summary of all-round issues such as growth rate, household debt, income tax, corporate tax, and Capital Market Act
  • Candidate Lee Jun-seok emphasizes risk-taking philosophy, corporate tax/minimum wage local autonomy, Commercial Act amendment and strengthening of minority shareholder rights, and practical welfare reform
  • Focus on practical household support measures such as substantial reform of inheritance tax/dividend income tax and grace periods for mortgage loans
  • Repeatedly emphasizes the need for strategic readjustment of education-human capital and future preparation based on AI/software
  • Economic policy prioritizes short-term/medium-term policy combination, minimizing political intervention, and improving capital market transparency and investment environment

< Summary >

– Candidate Lee Jun-seok aims for ‘pragmatism’ and ‘risk-taking’ and emphasizes rational changes and realistic alternatives in fiscal, financial, and corporate policies.
– Local economy and energy policy emphasize strengthening autonomy and decentralized strategies, and emphasize capital market transparency such as minority shareholder rights.
– Shows a willingness for substantial reform with specific economic policies such as tax system reform and amendment of the Commercial Act/Capital Market Act.
– He also mentions future responses such as growth potential, human capital, and AI, and calls for fundamental changes in economic policy.

[Related Articles…]

*YouTube Source: [와이스트릿 – 지식과 자산의 복리효과]


– [대선 특집 라이브] 이준석 후보에게 묻습니다, 위기의 한국 경제와 주식시장, AI 시대를 향한 여정까지

 ● Dollar Dives Global Market Turbulence: Key Summary of the U.S. Credit Rating Downgrade and Economic Outlook for the Second Half of 2024 1. The Aftermath of the U.S. Credit Rating Downgrade and Global Market Reactions – Despite concerns that the U.S. credit rating downgrade could trigger a global economic crisis, the overall market…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature is an online magazine made by culture lovers. We offer weekly reflections, reviews, and news on art, literature, and music.

Please subscribe to our newsletter to let us know whenever we publish new content. We send no spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time.