● Trump Comeback Ignites Q4 Uranium, Lithium Boom

Trump 2.0’s “Direct Push” Strategic Assets: Lithium, Rare Earths, Uranium and the Intel Rebuild — Q4 Key Battle Points Summarized

What you will take away from this piece

Over the remaining three months of this year, I neatly summarize the policy drivers that actually work in the stock market.

• If you accurately understand where the government is spending money, you see cash flows instead of themes.
• I distinguish facts between rumors of “government equity purchases” and actual policy instruments (loans, subsidies, offtakes).
• I explain why uranium is a likely next target, identify the key bottleneck (HALEU enrichment), and outline beneficiary groups step by step.
• The essence of the Intel rebuild is plant utilization and customer acquisition — I explain which companies benefit directly from a proposed 1:1 production rule.
• I link signals for re-entering the lithium price cycle and the logic for a “price floor” created by China’s 2025 battery restructuring with data points.
• I provide ETF-based portfolio construction for endurance and a time-ordered event calendar.
  Top-level keywords like the global economic outlook, artificial intelligence, rate cuts, and geopolitical risk are also naturally woven throughout the piece.

0. 2020–2025 timeline at a glance

2020–2021: EV boom and lithium surge.
2022–2023: Sharp rise in rates and demand slowdown lead to commodity price collapse.
2024: Acceleration of U.S. supply-chain reset (semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, nuclear fuel). DOE and DoD financial support becomes full-scale.
H1 2025: Geopolitical risk expands, expectations for a weaker dollar and rate cuts bring commodities, defense, and nuclear fuel themes back into focus.
H2 2025 (Q4): Policy execution shifts from “promises → contracts → groundbreaking/operation.” This begins to be reflected in earnings and cash flows.

1. “Direct government equity purchases” controversy vs policy tools that actually move markets

Recently a phrase has been circulating in communities that “the government will buy 10–15% stakes in listed companies.”
In principle, the U.S. government buying equity in listed companies is exceptional and rare.
The tools that have real market impact are the following three.

• Low-interest long-term loans (Loan Programs Office, LPO): multi-billion-dollar financing for projects like Lithium Americas (Thacker Pass). This greatly reduces capital costs.
• DPA Title III subsidies/contracts (Defense Production Act): support for expanding production capacity in areas like MP Materials, nuclear fuel, and defense semiconductors.
• Long-term purchase/offtake contracts (including RFPs): the government or big tech/auto OEMs commit to “we’ll buy ten years’ worth.” Banks look at these and open project finance, lowering WACC further.
  The key point is “lowering the cost of capital” rather than “equity purchases themselves.”
  Even a 2–3 percentage point drop in WACC significantly boosts NPV, which in turn leads to valuation rerating.
  If you understand this precisely, your difficulty in interpreting news drops substantially.

2. Lithium Americas and the North American lithium supply chain

The company is Canadian by nationality, but the key project is Thacker Pass in Nevada, USA.

• Why is it important? It is one of the largest lithium assets in the U.S., reducing China-dependence risk.
• What has changed? LPO loan approval lowers construction and equipment financing rates well below market.
• GM offtake/strategic participation increases project bankability.
• Production timing: Market consensus historically guided commercial production toward 2027–2028; construction progress and environmental litigation issues must be monitored continuously.
  Key investment checklist has three items.
  1) Construction progress (quarterly CAPEX spend/site photos/commissioning milestones).
  2) Additional offtake agreements and price formulas (linkage to lithium carbonate/hydroxide indices).
  3) Whether a price floor has formed after China’s restructuring (inventory/operating rates/export quota checks).

3. Rare earths: MP Materials and the power of “offtake”

DoD’s DPA Title III support focuses on bottleneck facilities like separation and refining.
Apple is expanding long-term contracts on the civilian side for rare-earth permanent magnets (neodymium) through recycling and sourcing.
In short, what pushed up valuations was the combination of “government subsidies + private long-term purchases.”
When rare earth prices (NdPr) attempt to break out of the bottom, stock price elasticity is greater.
However, China’s price policies and export licensing amplify swings, so position sizing should be conservative.

4. Next target candidate: Uranium/nuclear power — where is the bottleneck

The real core is the “enrichment stage,” especially HALEU (high-assay low-enriched uranium, between 5–20%).

• Inflection point ① Roadmaps banning/reducing Russian-enriched uranium. Expansion of domestic conversion (UF6) → enrichment → fuel fabrication lines in the U.S. is required.
• Inflection point ② DOE’s HALEU commercialization contracts and the confirmation of pilot supply volumes.
• Beneficiary groups:
  · Enrichment/fuel: Centrus Energy (HALEU), Cameco (enrichment/fuel affiliates), BWX (reactors/services).
  · Projects/operations: life extensions of existing large reactors and SMR pipelines.
  ETF options are straightforwardly URA (uranium miners/fuel chain) and NLR (nuclear utilities).
  Uranium miners have high price leverage, while utilities offer cash-flow stability and complement each other.

5. Semiconductor reorganization and the Intel rebuild: the practical benefit of a 1:1 production rule

The policy intention is simple.
“Produce in the U.S. and I’ll exempt you from imports” incentivizes domestic production more than a tariff bomb would.

• Direct beneficiaries: companies that own/expand foundry/packaging capacity in the U.S. (Intel, GlobalFoundries, Amkor U.S. packaging, etc.).
• Indirect beneficiaries: foreign fabs increasing U.S. production (TSMC Arizona, Samsung Texas) also get buffered from tariff risk.
  Three core checkpoints for Intel are:
  1) Foundry utilization and new customer acquisition (speed of conversion from test chips to outsourced mass production).
  2) Yield in internalized advanced packaging (CoWoS/panel-level).
  3) CHIPS subsidies/tax credit execution timeline.
  AI benefits are not a single NVIDIA chain; they are spreading to HBM (Micron, SK hynix), substrates and packaging, optical networking (Coherent, Marvell), and EDA (SNPS, CDNS).
  Q4 attention shifts to the “second- and third-tier AI infrastructure supply chain.”

6. The price-floor logic created by China’s 2025 battery restructuring

China’s 2025 restructuring/capacity-reduction guidance sends two signals.

• Clearing out low-margin facilities eases fixed-cost pressure.
• Reordering the domestic order book toward domestic sales reduces export dumping.
  Lithium, nickel, and graphite bottoms can be confirmed with inventory and operating-rate data.
  Before prices surge, the sequence “announce cuts → operating rates fall → inventories shrink” repeats.
  That three-step sequence is currently playing out with time lags, so the credibility of the price-floor logic is increasing.

7. Practical portfolio guide implemented with ETFs

I recommend a diversified allocation across commodities and policy beneficiaries.

• Uranium/nuclear: URA 5–10%, NLR 3–5%.
• Lithium/batteries: LIT 5–10%.
• Rare earths/resources: REMX 3–7%, metals/mining supplement XME 3–5%.
• Semiconductors (U.S. production focus): SOXX or SMH 7–12%.
• Cash/short-term bonds: volatility defense 10–20%.
  Three cautions.
  1) Commodity ETFs are highly volatile, so rebalancing rules are essential.
  2) ETFs with high China exposure should have position sizing split to account for geopolitical risk.
  3) Volatility around events (approvals/contracts) is large, so dollar-cost averaging for buys and staggered exits are basic.

8. Q4 event calendar and risk management

• U.S. government shutdown risk: historically, declines are temporary and followed by recoveries. Mechanically averaging into dips has been effective.
• Employment/inflation data: determine the rate-cut betting path. Legacy cyclical stocks, commodities, and structural AI infrastructure investment may rotate out of sync.
• Geopolitical risk: expansion of the Russia–Ukraine front, the Middle East, and Asian maritime freight rates. Gold, defense, and nuclear ETFs serve as hedges.
• Earnings season: the pace of AI investment execution and order backlog updates are key. Pay particular attention to guidance from packaging, power, and networking companies.

9. Data sources and checklist

• DOE LPO dashboard: updates on new loans/commitments.
• CHIPS.gov announcements: subsidy/tax credit beneficiary companies and terms.
• DoD DPA Title III notices: supply-chain expansion target items.
• EIA/IAEA/DOE (nuclear fuel) statistics: progress on conversion, enrichment, and fuel fabrication.
• China MIIT/industry association releases: battery cuts, operating rates, export licenses.
  Check whether these indicators are accelerating the “policy → contract → groundbreaking/operation” timetable.

Points not often mentioned elsewhere

• Far more powerful than the government “buying stakes in listed companies” is lowering WACC via LPO, DPA, and offtakes. That alone can boost NPV.
• The real bottleneck in uranium is not mines but HALEU enrichment, and the timing of DOE long-term purchase contracts is the trigger for sector rerating.
• The Intel rebuild is driven not by tariffs but by incentives that exempt U.S.-produced volumes, which simultaneously boost utilization and customer attraction.
• China’s restructuring signals arrive before dramatic price headlines. Operating rates and inventory data are true leading indicators of a bottom.

< Summary >

Q4’s returns concentrate on “where the government spends money.”
Rather than equity purchase rumors, LPO loans, DPA subsidies, and offtake contracts lower capital costs and lift valuations.
Lithium’s North American projects have clarified production timelines as financing is secured, and China’s restructuring strengthens the price-floor signal.
The next target is uranium/nuclear, with HALEU enrichment and long-term purchase contracts as catalysts.
Semiconductors benefit from incentives like the 1:1 production rule for U.S.-made volumes, and AI’s supply chain is spreading into second- and third-tier suppliers.
Manage volatility with an ETF-centric diversification approach and staggered trades around events.
In a phase of global economic uncertainty, the rate-cut path and geopolitical risks actually support the relative strength of policy-beneficiary sectors.

[Related posts…]

Key checkpoints for U.S. nuclear and uranium supply-chain reorganization
Comparison of Intel, Samsung, and TSMC’s U.S. strategies after the CHIPS Act

*Source: [ 소수몽키 ]

– 또 주식 사들인 트럼프, 다음 후보를 찾아나선 투자자들

---

---

● France Downgrade Shock – Eurozone Contagion Looms

French Credit Rating Downgrade: Will It Spread to a European Fiscal Crisis? Key Checkpoints and an Investment Timeline Summary

This piece contains ① the real triggers behind the downgrade of France’s credit rating, ② the lesser-known limits of safeguards such as the ECB’s TPI activation conditions, ③ market microstructure warning signs like the OAT‑Bund spread and short‑vs‑long rate steepening, ④ contagion paths across Europe and containment mechanisms, and ⑤ scenarios for Korean investment, corporate, and policy responses.

I unpacked the “invisible levers” that other news sources miss—such as Eurosystem collateral haircuts, Solvency II rules for insurers, concentration in the government bond auction calendar, and index inclusion rules.

Actionable items you can use immediately from the perspectives of the global economy, macro outlook, interest rates, inflation, and risk management are provided in chronological order.

1) 2025–2026 Timeline and Checkpoints

After Fitch’s downgrade in September, Moody’s in October and S&P’s assessment in November are the first major market volatility inflection points.

The point when France’s 2026 budget framework is finalized and AFT’s (French Treasury Agency) large fourth‑quarter auction calendar are the second inflection points for interest‑rate volatility.

The decision on whether to apply the EU’s Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) and approval of any implementation plan is the third inflection point that directly affects the likelihood of ECB TPI activation.

Comments on sovereign bond fragmentation at ECB monetary policy meetings are the fourth inflection point that will influence the direction of the OAT‑Bund spread.

2) French Credit Rating Downgrade: What Actually Changed

Fitch flagged structural increases in the government debt ratio, a slowdown in FDI inflows, and growing external debt burdens simultaneously as red flags.

The core issue is that a delayed shift back to fiscal consolidation after the pandemic has hardened into a structural budget deficit.

If further downgrades follow, Eurosystem collateral haircuts could be raised one notch, raising banks’ repo funding costs and reducing the liquidity premium for sovereign bonds.

3) French Fiscal Soundness: Why Its Trajectory Differs from the European Average

The eurozone average has seen debt ratios gradually stabilize after the pandemic through progressive fiscal normalization.

France’s chronic deficit dynamic has worsened since the 2000s because expenditure rigidities exceed revenue elasticity.

Going forward, aging, energy transition, and defense spending will structurally push up expenditures while slower potential growth will constrain revenue expansion.

4) Political Instability: The Political Difficulty of Fiscal Consolidation

Pension and welfare adjustments spill onto the streets, causing parliamentary gridlock and policy delays.

Political uncertainty raises sovereign risk premia, entrenches higher interest‑rate caps, and increases the cost of fiscal consolidation.

5) Macro Stability: What Yield Curve Steepening Tells Us

Rapid steepening between France’s 30‑year and 2‑year yields signals a rise in long‑term risk premia.

Large sovereign issuance crowds out private credit, pushing up corporate bond spreads and the ceilings on lending rates.

Entrenched higher long‑term rates weaken housing markets and capex, damaging the durability of growth.

6) Will It Spread into a European Fiscal Crisis: Contagion Paths and Containment Devices

Contagion path 1 is the OAT‑Bund spread widening pushing up peripheral spreads like BTP‑Bund via risk‑parity effects.

Contagion path 2 is insurers’ deleveraging of duration‑matching positions, which amplifies selling pressure on long‑dated bonds through the Solvency II channel.

Contagion path 3 is higher margin requirements leading to expanded futures and CDS margin calls.

Containment device 1 is the ECB’s TPI, which can purchase secondary‑market government bonds in disorderly market fragmentation on a conditional and potentially unlimited basis.

Containment device 2 includes the Eurosystem collateral framework and ESM/OMT backstops, although OMT requires program participation and thus carries significant political cost.

The key point is TPI’s conditionality: if fiscal discipline and reform implementation are weak, confidence in activation declines.

7) Five “Really Important Points” That Other News Misses

First, TPI is not automatic.

Under the EDP, if the fiscal trajectory is not credible, expectations of TPI activation do not immediately guarantee a downward adjustment in spreads.

Second, higher collateral haircuts raise banks’ repo costs, increasing the marginal cost constraints on banks’ trading books—the core buyers of sovereign bonds.

Third, Solvency II increases capital ratio volatility for insurers in sharp rate moves, amplifying selling pressure on long OATs.

Fourth, AFT’s quarter‑end and year‑end auction concentration tends to temporarily evaporate liquidity premia and overexpand rate gaps.

Fifth, global government bond index inclusion rules can trigger weight adjustments when liquidity or tradability deteriorates, causing passive funds to sell unintentionally.

8) Global Economic Spillovers: Interest Rates, Inflation, and Growth

European fiscal uncertainty raises the term premium in global rates, putting indirect upward pressure on long yields in the US, UK, and Japan.

Headline inflation may fall due to demand weakness, but rising fiscal costs that are passed through via higher public tariffs or taxes can keep core inflation sticky.

The result is a higher likelihood of a combination of prolonged high rates and entrenched low growth for the world economy.

9) Implications for Korea and Asia

Exports may feel a slowdown as demand for capital goods and consumer goods in Europe softens.

Domestic long‑term rates will tend to move in sync with the global term premium, raising the floor for yields.

The won will see increased volatility in risk‑off episodes, but a sudden one‑way large depreciation is limited if external balances improve and current‑account surpluses persist.

Policy should shift toward expansionary fiscal measures that are structural‑reform oriented—spending that boosts investment, productivity, and the revenue base—and restoring medium‑term fiscal rules is essential for credibility.

10) Intersection with AI Trends: New Variables for Long‑Term Rates and Fiscal Policy

Europe’s AI and data‑center investment cycle will demand large public and private capex for power grids, semiconductors, and cloud infrastructure.

In the short term this supports higher net sovereign issuance and underpins the upper bound of yields, but in the medium term it could be offset by productivity gains and a broader tax base.

After MiCA implementation, the spread of euro stablecoins and pilot sovereign bond tokenization could improve microstructure in secondary markets, reducing settlement risk and bond fragmentation.

11) Investment, Corporate, and Policy Action Plan

Investors should monitor the OAT‑Bund spread, EONIA‑repo spread, and European bank CDS together, and use a segmented approach to duration.

A defensive basket focused on high‑quality dividend stocks and investment‑grade corporate bonds, plus selective exposure to AI infrastructure winners, is reasonable.

Corporates with high European order exposure should tighten price renegotiation, hedge FX, and adopt more conservative inventory policies; euro‑denominated borrowing should be staggered and hedged with interest‑rate swaps.

Policy should prioritize structural‑reform‑type expansionary spending over cyclical stimulus, and preemptively secure credibility by legalizing medium‑ to long‑term fiscal paths.

12) Conclusion: More Likely a Fixation on High Rates and Low Growth Than an Acute “Crisis”

Thanks to the ECB’s safety nets, a direct slide into a European fiscal crisis is unlikely, but the costs of an entrenched higher upper bound for long rates and slower growth are realistic.

Ultimately, the core issue is not rates but credibility.

If fiscal paths and reform credibility are restored, premia can compress quickly; if not, the premia will be levied daily like a tax.

Appendix: Date‑by‑date Calendar

Fitch’s downgrade in September created the first shock.

Moody’s in October and S&P in November are the windows for a second shock or confirmation.

Large fourth‑quarter French bond auctions and year‑end budget negotiations tend to form the peak of rate volatility.

ECB meeting comments on fragmentation risk and mentions of TPI provide clues on the spread direction.

How to Read the Data: Three‑Line Summary

When short‑vs‑long steepening occurs, interpret it as “a rise in long‑term risk premia.”

If the OAT‑Bund spread widens rapidly in 10bp increments, judge it as “a loss of policy credibility.”

If bank CDS and insurer equities move down together, view it as “deleverage in progress.”

Risk Management Checklist

Reduce exposure to cash‑flow‑sensitive sectors and approach rate‑sensitive assets with phased purchases.

Check contracts for clauses linking European revenue to interest rates and inflation.

Use options within FX hedges to protect against tail risks.

One‑Line Insight

What is needed now is not more debt but greater credibility and faster productivity gains.

< Summary >

The essence of France’s credit downgrade is a loss of credibility caused by delayed fiscal normalization and political uncertainty after the pandemic.

The probability of contagion into a eurowide fiscal crisis is low thanks to ECB safety nets, but the reality of an entrenched higher long‑rate ceiling and slower growth is becoming apparent.

The answers for investors and policymakers are segmented duration, preference for quality assets, structural‑reform‑oriented spending, and restoration of confidence in the fiscal path.

[Related articles…]

European sovereign bond convulsions and a dissection of the ECB’s TPI card

France’s fiscal deficit and the 2025 outlook for the OAT‑Bund spread

*Source: [ 경제 읽어주는 남자(김광석TV) ]

– 프랑스 재정부실과 정치불안이 신용등급 강등으로 이어져… 유럽 재정위기로 확산할까? [경읽남 212화]

---

---

● Naver-Upbit Mega Merger, KRW Stablecoin Power Grab

Naver-Upbit Merger Rumors: Why ‘Now’ and Why ‘The Two’?

The article below covers the practical shift of managerial control around the merger structure, the revenue formula and interest-rate cycle sensitivity of a won-denominated stablecoin, the logic of a two-step deal design to address regulation, the battleground of competing consortia, and new revenue opportunities where AI, payments, and trading converge.

When other reports list numbers only, I will follow through to the end on “why this combination alone can become number one” and “where the money is made.”

1) 2023–2025 timeline and current position

In 2023–2024, regulators progressively organized rules for digital assets while simultaneously discussing payment tokens and tokenized deposits.

As the scope of bank participation, reserve custody methods, and AML/KYC standards became concrete, the broad picture of consortia competition among large platforms, exchanges, and banks became a near-certain trajectory.

From late 2024 into 2025, Naver-Upbit merger rumors have risen, and the market views the operator that captures the “won stablecoin-payment-trading” full stack as the one that will seize network effects.

In other words, now is an inflection point where regulation, technology, and demand converge, and the fact that the first leader absorbs most liquidity is the key point.

2) Core of the deal structure: Why ‘Naver Financial’ first?

The reason a pre-merger pairing with Naver Financial is discussed instead of a direct parent-company-to-parent-company merger is that it acts as a buffer to minimize regulatory frictions.

Electronic financial services and Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) are supervised under different frameworks and involve different stakeholders.

It is preferable to establish the payment network first by leveraging trust in payments (from banks, merchants, and consumers), and then proceed to integrate governance with trading infrastructure in stages to reduce licensing and review risks.

Also, ring-fencing by license—separating fee settlement, reserve management, and risk management frameworks for each license—offers advantages in regulator engagement and system stability.

3) Who will hold real managerial control: two forces stronger than ‘shareholding’

It is easy to be misled by surface share ratios.

Actual control is determined by the following two factors.

• Shareholders’ agreements and board design.
• The location of key assets and the attribution of the cash cows.

The payment network, Pay usage points, traffic, and advertising/commerce data reside with Naver.

Trading liquidity, token listing capabilities, and institutional custody reside with Upbit.

Therefore, the two companies have a strong incentive to choose a jointly controlled board with division of key positions and a ring-fenced VASP subsidiary structure.

Rather than who the largest shareholder is, the real power is decided by who can open or close the three valves: “payment-trading-stablecoin reserves.”

4) The single reason they must combine: network effects of a won-denominated stablecoin

A stablecoin explodes only when ‘use cases’ and ‘liquidity’ are attached simultaneously.

If there are many payment use cases but no exchange liquidity, price stability and exits are weak; if there is strong exchange liquidity but no payment use cases, its currency function is weak.

Naver provides online transaction volume, the Naver Pay merchant network, and advertising/commerce traffic, while Upbit provides crypto liquidity and on-/off-ramps.

If the two axes are combined into one company, issuance-distribution-payment-redemption can circulate internally and create a structure where the first leader takes most of the market.

5) Stablecoin revenue model dissected: dynamics of interest and fees

• Yield from reserve asset management.
• Earnings from government bonds/deposits, which narrow margins in a falling interest rate environment.
• Payment/settlement fees.
• Merchant MDR, remittance/exchange fees, and on-/off-ramp fees combined.
• Exchange-side ancillary revenues.
• Trading fees, prime listing fees, institutional custody, penalties/slashing-avoidance incentives, etc.

Therefore, in a falling-rate environment, reserve yield declines must be compensated by payment/trading fees.

If companies are separate, fees leak externally, but if merged, internal settlement offsets costs.

This ‘internalization’ is the real cost advantage of a merger.

6) Regulation and risk checklist: points that could allow or block the deal

• Licensing suitability.
• 100% reserve backing of won-linked assets, separate custody, continuous redeemability, and an audit framework are core requirements.
• Bank partners.
• Participation of major commercial banks is a trust factor and a guarantee of redemption liquidity.
• Competition restriction review.
• Whether the vertical integration of payments and trading is innovation or lock-in could be contested.
• AML/KYC and consumer protection.
• When a large influx of Pay users occurs, advanced fraud detection systems (FDS) are essential.
• Accounting treatment.
• Transparency of accounting policies regarding recognition of reserve income, recognition of customer liabilities, and presentation of volatility is required.

7) Competitive scenarios and consortium map

The basic skeleton is a three-way alliance of banks (trust) + payments/commerce (use cases) + exchanges (liquidity).

Coupang faces corporate-structure constraints that limit participation in a won stablecoin consortium, so Naver is effectively the top domestic payment and commerce platform.

On the exchange side, competition is likely to divide around Upbit and Bithumb, which will affect bank partnership alignments.

In conclusion, the “number one in payments + number one in trading liquidity” combination has the highest probability of winning, while other consortia will target niches (cross-border remittances, on-/offline settlement) in specific areas.

8) Valuation framework: what to compare against

While re-rating multiples are progressing on merger expectations, the peer set itself is changing.

• Commerce/advertising platform multiples.
• A PER of 15–20x relative to growth is an equilibrium point.
• Exchange/infrastructure multiples.
• High-volatility multiples reflecting cycle/regulatory risk, but high profitability.
• Stablecoin/fintech infrastructure.
• A premium reflecting interest-rate sensitivity and network effects is attached.

The point is not simple summation but revaluation from internal settlement, lock-in, and traffic crossover synergies.

If payment frequency and trading frequency amplify each other, ARPU and LTV can structurally rise.

9) Investor action plan: 10 signals to check

• LOI/MOU between Naver Financial and Upbit and guidance on exchange ratios.
• Whether bank partners are confirmed.
• Disclosure of reserve custody institutions and investment policies.
• Continuous redemption terms and the fee schedule for the stablecoin.
• Onboarding speed of Naver Pay payment destinations.
• Simplification of Upbit deposit/withdrawal flows and fee preferential treatment.
• Roadmap for AML/FDS enhancement and incident response SLAs.
• Board composition and allocation of key positions.
• Advertising/commerce cross-sell metrics.
• Bank and payment partner announcements from competing consortia.

10) Points of convergence with AI trends: real cases where revenue grows

• AI risk scoring.
• Integrating trading patterns and payment patterns to detect real-time anomalies reduces fraud losses and compliance costs.
• AI agent payments.
• LLM agents in shopping and content automatically handle payments/redemptions/subscription management via stablecoin.
• AI ad optimization.
• Reflecting payment conversion data in ad bidding to improve ROAS.
• Tokenized rewards.
• Integrating webtoon and commerce rewards into on-chain points and having AI recommend optimal exchange timing.

11) Macroeconomic variable check: interest rates, inflation, FX, liquidity, GDP

Falling interest rates are a headwind for reserve interest income but can be a tailwind for trading and payment activity.

Stable inflation increases predictability of payment volumes, and wider FX volatility stimulates cross-border remittance and exchange demand.

In a liquidity expansion phase, risk-asset preference rises and trading volumes increase, and GDP growth recovery directly boosts advertising and commerce demand.

In short, the key is a ‘portfolio effect’ that fills the reserve income lost to lower rates with growth in trading/payment/advertising.

12) Conclusion: a déjà vu of Daum-Kakao, or something beyond?

The Daum-Kakao merger was an example where the smaller party’s network absorbed the larger one’s.

This time, two different market leaders—one in the payment network and one in trading liquidity—would combine and burn a stablecoin as a common fuel.

If the first leader controls the market structure, internal settlement creates cost advantages, and AI enhances security and conversion rates, the very class of valuation multiples could change.

The decisive factors are regulation and execution.

Who first institutionalizes trust with banks, makes users ‘use’ the product, and manages risk with data will determine the winner.

< Summary >

The essence of Naver-Upbit merger rumors is to internalize payments and trading around a won-denominated stablecoin to capture both network effects and cost advantages.

A preliminary consolidation with Naver Financial is a rational staging to reduce regulatory frictions, and actual control is determined more by board design and placement of key assets than by the shareholder register.

Revenue is determined by a portfolio of interest, fees, and trading volume; in a falling-rate environment, growth in payments, trading, and advertising must compensate.

Bank partners, redemption terms, AML/FDS, exchange ratios, and onboarding speed of payment destinations are the most important checkpoints.

AI is a catalyst that drives real revenue through risk management and conversion rate improvements.

[Related articles…]

Comprehensive Guide to the Regulatory Roadmap for Won-Denominated Stablecoins

The New Profit Map Created by Integrating Upbit and Naver Payments and Trading

*Source: [ Jun’s economy lab ]

– 네이버 업비트 합병설, 둘이 합쳐야만 하는 이유

---

---