● Europe’s Defense Boom Ukraine-Trump Effect Fuels Global Re-rating, AI-Semiconductors to Benefit. ACE Europe Defense ETF Launches.

The ‘European Defense Cycle’ Triggered by the Russia-Ukraine and Trump Effects — What Has Changed and Where Is the Money Flowing? (Including Information on the ACE European Defense TOP10 ETF Listing)

This article begins with the unprecedented increase in defense budgets across Europe,discusses NATO’s agreement on defense spending as a percentage of GDP,Europe’s policy of supply chain localization (“Buy European”),the expansion of production capacity, even with car factories being converted to defense manufacturing,and how defense demand directly translates into the AI, semiconductor, and cybersecurity markets.Key points that are rarely covered in other YouTube videos or news outlets include:

• The practical impact of European policies (“Buy European”) and the investment implications of component localization regulations.
• The short-term surge in demand for ammunition and artillery shells, and the price increases (profit point) created by supply bottlenecks.
• The specific connection between increased defense spending and the demand for AI infrastructure (data centers, edge computing).

Past (Why Did the Current Rerating Begin?) — Background and Turning Point

The Trump administration’s tenure and policy pressure initiated discussions on increased European defense spending.Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 became a decisive catalyst, leading to a rapid increase in global defense budgets.Traditionally, defense is an industry heavily influenced by government budgets (defense spending).While there had been a steady upward trend since the 2000s, explosive growth began after 2022.NATO and EU member states have declared policies for self-defense and supply chain independence.

Key Points (Areas Other Media Often Miss):

• The combination of political risk (changes in US foreign policy) and real demand (replenishment of ammunition and equipment) creates not a “one-off order” but a “multi-year sustained order cycle.”
• Europe, with its fragmented supply chains, will experience frequent factory conversions and mergers & acquisitions as it seeks to rapidly expand production capacity.

Present (What is Happening Now?) — Practical Observations from Policy, Production, and Financial Perspectives

With NATO’s agreement on the 5% of GDP target, European defense spending has the potential to more than double in a short period.Looking at Europe as a whole, the growth rate of defense spending over the next five years will be the highest compared to other regions.The “Buy European” policy sets targets for the proportion of European-made products (e.g., 50% by 2030, 60% by 2035).This policy includes regulations on the proportion of European components within finished products (e.g., a certain percentage of the cost of the finished product) and financial support mechanisms such as joint procurement and loan guarantees.Result: The European defense value chain is rapidly being restored and expanded.

Specific Evidence:

• There are ongoing cases of existing automotive plants (Volkswagen, Porsche, etc.) converting some production lines, acquiring, or transitioning to defense companies.
• Short-term benefits are expected from the expansion of ammunition and artillery shell production lines (some companies have announced expansion goals of 300% to 1500%).
• The shift from conscription to voluntary service and movements to strengthen military service obligations are enhancing national defense readiness, solidifying the long-term basis for defense demand.

Future (What Are the Profitable Investment Opportunities Over the Next 3 to 10 Years?) — Growth Sectors and Investment Ideas

The expansion of European defense leads to the following investment themes:

• Key manufacturers of defense equipment (ground, air, naval platforms): Large companies with a high proportion of defense revenue (e.g., Rheinmetall, Thales, BAE).
• Manufacturers of ammunition and consumables: Suppliers expected to receive repeat orders will experience amplified short-term earnings leverage.
• Component and sub-supplier chains (sensors, electronic warfare components, specialty materials): Regional OEMs and Tier 2 suppliers will benefit from “Buy European” regulations.
• AI, Autonomy, Surveillance, Cybersecurity: The proportion of defense budgets allocated to software, AI systems, and cyber defense is increasing.
• Semiconductors, Edge Computing, Specialty Sensors: Demand for high-performance chips and sensors will grow due to the need for real-time processing and autonomous weapon systems.

Investment Execution Ideas:

• Exposure to regions and sectors through ETFs: Reduce individual stock risk (policy and order fluctuations) and quickly secure defense positions.
• ACE European Defense TOP10 ETF (Scheduled to list on September 23rd):
• Focuses on the top 10 European defense companies.
• The average defense revenue proportion of its constituents is approximately 73% (as of July).
• Selection criteria are based on fundamentals such as high defense revenue exposure and 12-month forward revenue growth.
• For individual stock investments, it is recommended to confirm technology and order pipelines, and then invest incrementally based on valuation and confirmed orders (backlog).

Additional Opportunities from an AI Perspective — The Impact of Defense Demand on the AI Ecosystem

The digital and AI transformation of defense budgets creates demand across the entire ICT (Information and Communications Technology) sector, beyond simple weapons sales.Specific Connections:

• Rapidly growing demand for AI software in areas like command and control (C4ISR), video analytics, drone autonomous flight, and cyber defense.
• Increased demand for edge AI hardware (specialized GPUs, ASICs) and communication infrastructure (satellites, satellite internet) due to real-time data processing needs.
• Due to security, privacy, and regulatory concerns (especially European data regulations), companies offering “sovereign cloud and AI” solutions are likely to gain a competitive advantage.

Investment Points:

• Gain indirect exposure to AI infrastructure (data centers, high-performance computing), semiconductors (specialized military chips), cybersecurity, and defense-specific software companies.
• Companies with strong dual-use (defense-civilian) technologies will benefit from both the civilian AI boom and increased defense budgets.

Risk Checklist — What to Consider Before Investing

Political Risks: The outcome of war escalation or de-escalation, and changes in US-European policies significantly impact orders and budgets.Financial Risks: A deterioration in the fiscal conditions of European countries could lead to delays in planned increases.Supply Chain Bottlenecks: Delays in expansion are possible due to shortages of ammunition, specialty materials, and skilled labor.ESG and Social Pressure: Defense investments may be restricted by some institutional investors and pension funds.Currency and Market Risks: Fluctuations in the Euro/Pound exchange rate, and general volatility in the European stock market.

Practical Hedging:

• For ETF investments, check currency hedging options and diversification/rebalancing rules.
• For individual stocks, confirm order backlogs, and monitor profitability (operating income volatility) and debt ratios.

Portfolio Recommendations (Realistic Allocation Strategy)

Conservative Approach: Allocate 2-5% of the portfolio to the defense sector (primarily through ETFs).Aggressive Approach: Allocate 5-12% to defense/national security-related ETFs, stocks, semiconductors, and AI infrastructure.Strategic Approach:

• Manage risk through dollar-cost averaging (DCA) during market downturns (when geopolitical tensions ease and stock prices fall).
• Short-term (1-3 years): Companies related to ammunition and consumables; Long-term (3-10 years): Platforms, AI, and state-contracted companies.

ACE European Defense TOP10 ETF — Why Pay Attention?

Listing Date: Scheduled for September 23, 2025 (Check listing information).Core Design: Focuses on the top 10 companies with high European defense revenue exposure to target “high exposure and high growth.”Composition Characteristics: Specialized defense sector ETF with an average defense revenue proportion of approximately 73%.Investment Advantages: Beneficiary of European policies (“Buy European”), significant financial backing from European countries, pursuit of alpha through concentrated positioning.Caution: Due to the concentrated nature of this ETF, there is significant exposure to individual country and company risks, so appropriate diversification and rebalancing are necessary.

Final Message — Why Focus on ‘European Defense’ Now?

The increase in European defense spending is not a one-time event but a structural change in policy, production capacity, and military strategy.Increased defense budgets have a ripple effect across the entire industry (manufacturing, components, software, AI, semiconductors).From an investment perspective, the most crucial factors are “policy sustainability” and “supply chain restructuring.”As institutional frameworks like “Buy European” are implemented, the European value chain will recover, leading to long-term visibility in sales and profits.Therefore, it is time to consider defense (especially European defense) exposure in a medium-to-long-term portfolio.

< Summary >Europe’s substantial increase in defense spending, driven by targets like NATO’s 5%, is positioning European defense as a global growth engine.”Buy European” policies, factory conversions, and expansion of conscription support long-term defense demand.Short-term beneficiaries: ammunition and consumables; Long-term beneficiaries: platforms, AI, cybersecurity, and semiconductors.The ACE European Defense TOP10 ETF (scheduled to list on 9/23) is noteworthy as a means to invest concentratedly in 10 leading European defense stocks with high defense revenue proportions.Investment Tips: Diversify with ETFs, check geopolitical, currency, and policy risks, and also include sectors that benefit from AI, semiconductor, and cyber linkages.

[Related Articles…]AI Investment Strategies and Infrastructure Opportunities (Key Summary)The Impact of Increased European Defense and National Defense Budgets on Financial Markets (Summary)

*Source: [ 소수몽키 ]

– 러시아, 이제는 유럽 전체까지 넘본다? 확전 위기에 돈이 몰리는 곳

---

---

● Global Economic Upheaval-Polarization, Poverty, Capitalism’s Core, AI, and Korea’s Response-7 Must-Read Insights

Global Economic System Overhaul: Polarization, Poverty, the Essence of Capitalism, and AI—7 Must-Read Insights from This Article

This article contains insights you absolutely cannot afford to miss.

1) The “hidden fact” of a real decrease in global poverty and the reasons behind it.

2) The structural risk of Trump-style protectionism evolving from mere tariffs into “predatory negotiations.”

3) A reversed analysis: COVID-19’s exacerbation of poverty was not a “failure of capitalism” but a result of “non-capitalist responses.”

4) The recurring pattern of “Populism & Power Concentration → Economic Stagnation,” confirmed by the cases of Venezuela and China.

5) Practical solutions to maintain capitalism’s advantages while mitigating inequality (including an understanding of policy trade-offs).

6) The industrial structure reshuffling, inequality risks, and practical regulatory/industrial policy directions brought about by AI trends.

7) A concrete roadmap of principles (Freedom, Competition, Discussion) and tactics (Pragmatism, Diversification, Openness + Security Balance) that South Korea should adopt.

1. Historical Context — Capitalism’s Gains and Limits (Past → Present)

Capitalism was the first system in history to significantly reduce widespread absolute poverty.

In the early 1990s, the proportion of people living in extreme absolute poverty was about 38%, but by 2015, it had fallen sharply to around 10%.

This fact highlights that global economic growth and free trade (global economic growth, free trade) have contributed to a reduction in extreme poverty.

However, capitalism has failed to distribute wealth equally, and the concentration of wealth in the top 1% has become a major cause of social conflict.

Key Fact: Many news outlets do not sufficiently emphasize that while “relative inequality” has widened, “absolute poverty” has significantly decreased.

2. Signs of Collapse in the Free Trade Era — Protectionism and “Predatory Economies”

The Trump administration’s “America First” policy went beyond simple tariff imposition, transforming into a demand for dictates on investment, transfer, and profit attribution in negotiations.

In other words, tariffs were used not as trade tools but as leverage to enforce “investment attribution.”

This approach undermines the free trade order and transforms global supply chains into instruments of political pressure.

The Core Point Often Underreported: The real danger is that the purpose of tariffs and trade barriers is shifting from “improving trade balances” to “reallocating economic sovereignty.”

3. COVID-19 and the Reversal of Poverty Reduction — A Counter-Intuitive Analysis

The rebound in poverty and child mortality rates after the 2020 pandemic was a result of non-capitalist responses such as lockdowns, trade disruptions, and educational shutdowns, rather than the “disease itself.”

Supply chain disruptions, movement restrictions, and lost educational opportunities have long-term, detrimental effects on the economically vulnerable.

Therefore, crisis response should focus on maintaining supply chains, ensuring continuity in education and healthcare, and fostering global cooperation, rather than mere cash handouts.

4. The Economic Cost of Populism — The Venezuelan Case and Generalization

Populist policies may be advantageous for short-term popularity but erode long-term growth and institutional trust.

The collapse of resource-rich Venezuela was driven by a complex interplay of political centralization, redistribution promises, nationalization, and investor distrust.

Data Point: Research showing an average 20% reduction in economic size compared to similar countries after populist leaders take power cannot be ignored.

The Key Takeaway: Every policy has trade-offs, and remedies that promise “immediate solutions” carry a high risk of collapsing the system.

5. Reinterpreting the Capitalist-Labor Debate — Value Creation and Distribution

The narrative that simply portrays capitalists’ profits as “exploitation” often overlooks the interplay of labor, innovation, and capital.

The role of entrepreneurs is to create business models that connect existing labor to higher productivity and demand, leading to the generation of surplus (profit).

However, from a societal consensus perspective, “return” and “social responsibility” are clearly demanded.

In Summary: Neither extreme socialism nor extreme laissez-faire can be a solution; a middle-ground institutional design is necessary.

6. China’s Economic Model Transition and Implications (Collective Leadership → Power Concentration)

China achieved high-speed growth during its early reform period (decentralized decision-making, pragmatism), but recent power concentration and increased political control are weakening its innovative momentum.

The purges and increased control under the Xi Jinping administration suppress internal criticism and diversity, burdening long-term productivity growth.

Important: While its GDP is large due to its population, its per capita productivity remains lower than that of developed countries.

Therefore, open economies like South Korea must strategically respond to China’s “policy risks.”

7. AI Trends and the Fourth Industrial Revolution — A Map of Opportunities and Risks

AI trends are the core driving force that will determine national competitiveness in the new economy (semiconductors, AI, robotics, batteries, etc.).

Simultaneously, AI has the potential to exacerbate inequality through winner-take-all dynamics (platform and data concentration).

A Point Less Discussed in the News: In the AI race, “data governance” and “competition policy (antitrust)” are essentially industrial policy.

Practical Strategies for South Korea are as follows:

– Secure foundational capabilities through long-term investment in R&D and infrastructure, while diversifying to avoid excessive reliance on specific global companies.

– Create an ecosystem where SMEs and startups can compete by designing data openness and sharing platforms, alongside balanced individual data rights.

– Support labor transition through massive investment in AI reskilling and training with social consensus.

8. South Korea’s Strategic Proposals — Principles and Tactics (Present → Future)

Principles: Adhere to Freedom (market entry), Competition (fair rules), and Discussion (policy transparency).

Tactics: Pragmatic approach, diversification (supply chains, investment destinations), and a balance of openness and security (technology transfer, foreign investment conditions) are essential.

Key Implementation Tasks:

1) Strategic industrial policy for core industries (semiconductors, AI, batteries)—strengthen competitiveness through “smart choices” rather than selection and concentration.

2) Multi-stakeholder and multiple-hub (nearshoring, friend-shoring) strategies for supply chain risk management.

3) Support startup scale-ups through regulatory sandboxes and public-private R&D funds.

4) In terms of fiscal policy, prioritizing medium- to long-term growth investments (R&D, infrastructure, talent development) over short-term consumption stimulus (coupons, etc.) is more desirable from an opportunity cost perspective.

9. Investment and Market Signals — Where to Focus

In terms of short-term market volatility, defensive sectors (food, energy, healthcare) serve as safe assets.

From a medium- to long-term investment perspective, focus should be on AI infrastructure (semiconductors, data centers), software (productivity, automation), and clean energy (batteries, renewables).

It is important to diversify portfolios geographically and industrially, reflecting policy risks.

10. The Most Important Message We Often Miss in the News

First, the historical reduction of absolute poverty is a tangible achievement of capitalism and free trade.

Second, the adverse effects of the pandemic were not due to the failure of capitalism itself but to the failure in designing crisis responses.

Third, protectionist and tariff policies can evolve beyond simple import restrictions to become tools for “realigning power” in the international economy.

Fourth, in the AI era, a triple balance of “data, competition, and governance” will create a greater difference than mere technological investment.

Conclusion — The Matter of Choice and Our Challenges

It is clear that capitalism is not perfect.

However, instead of simply negating or radically overturning alternatives, a realistic strategy is needed to maximize capitalism’s advantages and institutionally mitigate its side effects.

South Korea’s challenge is clear: promote competition based on openness, while compensating for vulnerabilities through security and industrial policies, and securing the infrastructure and talent suited for the AI and Fourth Industrial Revolution era.

< Summary >

Absolute poverty has significantly decreased over the past decades, but relative inequality has widened.

Trump-style protectionism, beyond simple tariffs, threatens global free trade through “predatory negotiations.”

The exacerbation of poverty due to the COVID-19 shock was a result of non-capitalist responses, highlighting the importance of crisis response design.

Populism and power concentration lead to long-term economic stagnation behind short-term popularity (Cases of Venezuela and China).

AI trends amplify both growth and inequality, making data governance, competition policy, and reskilling essential.

South Korea’s strategy must respond with principles of “Freedom, Competition, Discussion” and tactics of “Pragmatism, Diversification, Openness + Security Balance.”

[Related Articles…]

Stablecoin Wars and the 2026 Economic Outlook: Summary of Financial Risks and Regulatory Debates

AI Investment Strategy 2026: Analyzing Opportunities and Risks for Korean Companies

*Source: [ 경제 읽어주는 남자(김광석TV) ]

– [풀버전] 전세계 경제 체제가 흔들리고 있다. 양극화, 불평등, 빈곤… 부의 흐름은 왜 한쪽으로 쏠리는가? | 클로즈업 – ‘자본주의자 선언’ 북리뷰

---

---

● Nike’s Slide- Nike’s Rebound- AI- Supply Chain Revolution- Generational Shift- Data- Investment- Inflation- Interest Rates

Nike’s Fall and Conditions for Rebound — Who, Why, and How the Generation Shift Happened (Including Data, Investment, and AI Strategies)

The core points covered in this article are the following three:

1) The reality of the ‘generation shift’ Nike missed and specific data on its revenue decline.

2) Key solutions that other media outlets often overlook — AI-driven product personalization, modular manufacturing, and localized supply chain strategies, among others.

3) An investment checklist and practical analysis of how global economic, interest rate, and inflation variables impact stock prices.

The Past (Golden Age of the Brand) — A Period Where Nike’s Strengths and Limitations Coexisted

Nike built its global brand value through storytelling and sports star marketing.

It secured a strong fan base in basketball shoes (e.g., Air Jordan) and sneaker culture.

As a result, it established a strong premium pricing policy and a global distribution network.

However, this growth structure was accompanied by the decision-making inefficiencies and slow product launch cycles characteristic of large corporations.

The Recent Past (Symptoms and Data) — The Reality Told by Consumer Movement and Financial Indicators

Revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 was approximately $11.1 billion, a 12% decrease year-over-year.

During the same period, emerging running brands showed significant growth.

For instance, Hoka’s revenue increased by about 10%, while On Running grew by over 35%.

Consumer behavior indicators show a rapid shift among the younger generation, who prioritize ‘experience, comfort, and lightness.’

The culture of authentication on social media has an immediate impact on brand choice.

Short-Term Risks (From an Investor’s Perspective) — Variables to Check Immediately

First, declining revenue and sluggish new product sales put immediate pressure on stock prices.

Second, in the global economic environment, interest rates, inflation, and changes in tariffs affect both cost structures and consumer sentiment.

Third, a lack of digital competitiveness is a reason for falling behind in generating temporary demand.

Fourth, the burden of inventory and price adjustments squeezes margins and increases risks to cash flow.

Mid-Term Opportunities (Operational Strategies) — Key Measures Implementable Right Now

1) Organizational Structure Reform: To reduce decision-making delays inherent in large corporations, ‘incubator-style’ small, independent teams should be operated.

2) Product Innovation: Prioritize ‘comfort-focused’ design and lightweight technology tailored for Gen Z.

3) AI and Data Application: Actively adopt AI for demand forecasting, inventory optimization, and design A/B testing.

4) Logistics Optimization: Shorten launch times through nearshoring production and modular assembly.

5) Digital Marketing: Enhance ‘immediacy’ marketing by combining limited edition drops, resale platforms, influencers, and UGC.

Mid-Term Opportunities (Innovative Technologies) — Crucial Solutions Not Often Discussed Elsewhere

AI-based ‘Personal Midsole’ Design: By implementing personalized cushioning through 3D printing based on foot shape and gait data, premium pricing can be secured.

Modular Running Shoe Platform: Combining the same outsole/midsole modules with various uppers reduces SKU numbers while enabling rapid trend responsiveness.

Blockchain-based Limited Edition Tracking and Digital Ownership (Digital Sneakers): This reduces resale market fees and counterfeiting issues, thereby enhancing brand loyalty.

AI-driven Generative Design: This automatically creates prototypes that quickly reflect the preferences of younger demographics by learning trend data in real-time.

Long-Term Transformation (Brand Redefinition and Sustainability) — Rediscovering the Fundamental ‘Story’

For Nike to recover in the long term, it must re-interpret the ethos of ‘Just Do It’ from the perspective of the younger generation.

This should be an integrated strategy combining products, experiences, and social values, not just a simple campaign.

It must embrace consumers’ increasing ethical choices through eco-friendly materials and circular economy models.

As a global brand, it needs to strengthen local leadership that reflects regional cultural and economic differences.

The Intersection of AI Trends and Economic Variables — Points for Investors to Focus On

AI shortens the entire process from design to marketing to supply chain, reducing costs while enabling personalized pricing strategies.

Rising interest rates and inflation in the global economy can dampen premium demand for consumer goods, making price elasticity management crucial.

From a stock investment perspective, short-term performance declines may persist, but valuation can improve as the visibility of AI, modularization, and localized production transitions increases.

Portfolio adjustments are necessary, monitoring US stock markets and global economic trends while considering exchange rate and tariff risks.

Specific Execution Roadmap (Timeline-Based Recommendations)

0-6 Months: Set core KPIs (digital transformation metrics, product launch cycle, social media engagement) and launch small incubator teams.

6-18 Months: Introduce AI-based demand forecasting and pilot products targeting Gen Z to the market.

18-36 Months: Fully implement modular manufacturing and nearshoring to achieve a launch speed improvement of over 30%.

36+ Months: Secure long-term loyalty by redefining the brand story and adopting a circular economy model.

Investment Checklist (Quick Judgment for Investors)

Checkpoint 1: Track quarterly revenue and changes in same-store/channel sales.

Checkpoint 2: Verify the proportion of R&D and digital transformation CapEx and the visibility of AI investments.

Checkpoint 3: Assess the progress of supply chain restructuring (nearshoring) and its impact on cost improvements.

Checkpoint 4: Monitor market response indicators targeting Gen Z and Millennials (reviews, social media meme potential).

Checkpoint 5: Analyze sensitivity to interest rate, inflation, and tariff scenarios.

Warnings and Opportunities — Concluding Judgment

Warning: If reliance on bestsellers and a slow organizational structure are maintained, Nike will struggle to avoid mid-to-long-term profit decline.

Opportunity: Combining AI, modular manufacturing, localization, and personalization can lead to a strong rebound.

From an investment perspective, short-term loss risks exist, but re-rating potential is high once the execution of transformation becomes evident.

Points Other Media Outlets Miss (Remember These Points Only)

First, the ‘product experience’ is key to generation shift, more so than just marketing.

Second, AI is not just a cost-saving tool but a means to create ‘personalized premium’ experiences.

Third, supply chain proximity is not just a cost but enables ‘speed’ and ‘localized design testing.’

Fourth, sustainability is not a cost but brand capital supporting long-term demand.

Operational Tips (Immediate Advice for Marketers and Product Teams)

Implement short experimental cycles (e.g., A/B testing every 2 weeks) to quickly discard or scale designs and messages.

Operate mini-brands as separate entities to lower the cost of failure, then acquire successful models through M&A.

Use AI to create personalized recommendation models for customers, simultaneously boosting online conversion rates and retention.

A Final Word (For Both Brands and Investors)

Nike’s problems are not due to a lack of technology or capital, but a deficit in ‘speed’ and ‘reinterpretation.’

Regaining speed through AI and supply chain innovation, and reinterpreting young generations’ cultural codes through products and experiences, can lead to recovery.

However, this is not an option but a necessary structural transition.

< Summary >

Despite the brand power built through past marketing and sports stars, Nike is experiencing rapid revenue erosion as it loses the younger generation in the running shoe market.

Short-term risks include revenue decline, global economic factors (interest rates, inflation), and digital competitiveness, while mid-term solutions involve AI-based personalization, modular manufacturing, nearshoring, and incubator organizations.

Investors should be wary of short-term performance pressures but pay attention to re-rating potential as AI and supply chain restructuring become visible.

[Related Articles…]

Nike, Brand Strategy Facing Generational Shift Analysis

AI Transforming Financial Markets: The Future of Investment and Stocks

*Source: [ Maeil Business Newspaper ]

– [어바웃 뉴욕] 러닝화 전쟁에서 밀려난 나이키가 놓친 ‘세대 교체’ | 길금희 특파원

---

---