● AI Bond Bubble, Fed Rescue, Market Reckoning

[Wall Street View Analysis] “Trump Might Not Want a Rising Market” BofA Hartnett’s Warning on AI Bonds and Interest Rate/Inflation Scenarios

This article includes a radical claim and supporting evidence that the next round of quantitative easing by the Fed could be directed toward purchasing AI hyperscaler corporate bonds.
It outlines how the gap between Trump’s strategy for managing his voter base and the stock market rally connects, examining the intersection of politics and economics.
It compresses the differences between credit spreads and the surge in hyperscaler bond issuances, as well as the timing signals of “beware vs. get out,” into numbers and examples.
It encompasses a strategy of “waiting” rather than shorting, and positions a concrete recession hedge through long-term zero-coupon bonds.
It reconstructs scenarios for the next 3 to 12 months using the global economic trend along with the axes of the US stock market, interest rates, inflation, and AI investment.

News at a Glance

BofA’s Mike Hartnett issued a memo stating, “Tensions between the market and Main Street are intensifying, and politics may keep the stock market in check.”
He mentioned the possibility of the Fed purchasing corporate bonds from AI hyperscalers (big tech and cloud) in the next QE phase, warning of an AI bond bubble risk.
While there are many “beware” signals, he advised waiting on large short positions because “get out right now” signals have not yet emerged.
He suggested that long-term zero-coupon bonds are the optimal recession hedge given the slowdown in the labor market and a deepening K-shaped economic pattern.
In the political realm, he observed that a high stock market could actually result in lower voter support and that Trump might focus on rising prices and the cost of living.

Dynamics of Politics and the Market: Will Trump Focus on the ‘Cost of Living’ Rather Than a ‘Market Rally’?

Recent election results confirm that the market’s record highs are increasingly disconnected from voter sentiment.
Main Street factors such as cost-of-living pressures, rent, and job insecurity are exerting a greater influence on votes.
Hartnett points out that “a higher stock price could mean lower votes,” suggesting that politicians may not tolerate an overheated market.
This implies a scenario where Wall Street’s overheating is “managed” through policy tools such as tariffs, antitrust measures, regulatory tightening, and fiscal actions.
In the global economic environment, political risks can amplify exchange rate and capital flow volatility, becoming a discount factor for the US stock market.

The True Nature of AI Bonds: Can Hyperscaler Corporate Bonds Become the Focus of the Next QE?

The scale of investment in AI infrastructure is growing to levels that cash flow alone cannot support.
There has been a sharp rise in the issuance of corporate bonds by hyperscalers and companies in the semiconductor, memory, and data center ecosystems.
Hartnett presented a bold possibility: “If defaults occur in this segment, the Fed could step in and buy AI hyperscaler corporate bonds to put out the fire.”
He bases his argument on precedents such as the Fed’s purchase of MBS in 2008 and corporate bonds in 2020, showing that the focus of intervention changes depending on where the crisis emerges.
Early warning signs include the expansion of credit spreads centered on the AI investment ecosystem from 50bp to 80bp.
The ignition sequence could progress as “weakness in AI bonds → some issuances canceled or experiencing refinancing difficulties → expansion of credit spreads → revaluation of equities.”

“Beware” Signals Are Abundant, So Why Not “Get Out” Now?

There are already many warning indicators such as record market capitalization, valuation pressure, market concentration, individual investors’ tilt toward tech stocks, and global capital inflows.
However, Hartnett’s argument is that in the absence of Fed rate hikes, the typical “get out” trigger remains absent.
Bank and broker-dealer soundness and credit spreads have not yet collapsed to critical levels, and the IPO market is not completely frozen.
Thus, directional shorting is a “timing game,” and he favors a strategy of selectively shorting the more vulnerable “AI hyperscaler bonds” within the credit chain.
He draws a comparison with the past when tech bonds began to wobble about 12 months before the dot-com peak.

K-Shaped Economic Pattern and Labor Market Slowdown: Why Long-term Zero-Coupon Bonds?

Tangible indicators such as job cuts and a rise in the unemployment rate among new graduates are trending toward a slowdown.
While AI is driving a productivity narrative, rents, mortgages, and the cost of living do not provide short-term relief.
Weak housing starts reflect the weakening resilience of the middle class and could be a precursor to reduced consumption.
In this context, long-term zero-coupon bonds are proposed as an efficient recession hedge relative to their volatility.
While taking advantage of the high sensitivity to duration in a bet on falling interest rates, managing duration risk remains key.

Summary of Numbers and Data Points

Approximately $120 billion in corporate bond issuances related to hyperscalers and the AI ecosystem has been mentioned over the past 7 weeks.
There are signs that the AI credit spread is expanding from 50bp to 80bp.
Tech corporate bonds experienced an approximate 8% decline 12 months ahead of the dot-com peak.
In the labor market, there are accounts of job losses increasing and the unemployment rate among new graduates rising from 4% to 8%.
The IPO market shows signs of contraction, but not to the extent of being completely frozen.

Investment Checklist: Tactics and Signals

• Interest Rate/Inflation Triggers
  A suggestion by the Fed of another rate hike or a sharp rise in real interest rates could trigger a “get out” signal.
  A re-heating of core inflation poses risks to duration exposure.
• Credit Warnings
  Monitor the speed of expanding spreads on corporate bonds issued by hyperscalers, data centers, and firms in the semiconductor value chain, as well as any decline in new issuance coverage.
  News of refinancing failures or delayed issuances may signal impending chain risks.
• Liquidity and Banking System
  Bank credit events and a reduction in broker-dealer leverage are signals approaching a “get out” state.
• Positioning
  The consensus is that it is still too early for directional equity shorts.
  Instead, it is recommended to selectively short AI hyperscaler bonds, adjust exposure to potentially overvalued and concentrated tech stocks, and hedge with long-term zero-coupon bonds.
• Macro Factors
  Expanding political risks and exchange rate volatility may unsettle capital flows.
  A transition to a weaker dollar could revive the argument for increased exposure to emerging markets and China.

The Most Important Point Not Often Mentioned Elsewhere

• A Shift in the Recipients of the Next QE
  If the focus of shortcomings in this cycle shifts to AI credit, the Fed’s unconventional interventions could change targets.
  This would be an extension of the learning experience from 2008 and 2020, where the Fed “saved credit before equities,” thereby altering the order of the stock market recovery.
• The Incentive for Politics to Intentionally Cool the Market
  If cost-of-living anger sways voter sentiment, politicians might not overlook asset price overheating.
  They could attempt to “regulate Wall Street’s temperature” through tools such as tariffs, regulatory measures, fiscal policies, and antitrust actions.
• The Asymmetry Between AI Investment and Credit
  While the AI narrative can drive stock prices higher, it is the bonds that first experience stress in financing.
  Therefore, the key to timing is to observe the asymmetry where “equities remain intact while credit wavers first.”

3 to 12 Months Scenario Map

• Baseline
  Slower growth, gradually easing inflation, a steady Fed stance, and localized credit stress.
  Equities remain rigid at the top, credit deteriorates selectively, and long-term yields gradually decline.
• Hard Scenario
  Re-heating of inflation or indications of another rate hike → compression of multiples, duration losses, and approaching “get out” territory.
• Easing Scenario
  Further weakening in labor and housing and additional easing in inflation → strong long-term bonds, with indices holding up due to solid performance in big tech while mid- and small-caps differentiate.

Execution Ideas and Precautions

Long-term zero-coupon bonds require careful management of position size and volatility due to their extreme sensitivity to interest rates.
Manage credit risk first by selecting companies with high CapEx relative to cash flow for AI exposure.
For equities, adjust exposure to overheated sectors, secure option value with cash and short-term bonds, and take a phased approach based on specific data points.
Since exchange rate spikes may occur around political events, plan your hedging costs and rebalancing calendar in advance.

< Summary >BofA Hartnett sees an increasing disconnect between the stock market and voter sentiment, suggesting that politics now has an incentive to rein in Wall Street’s overheating.
He presents a radical scenario in which AI hyperscaler corporate bonds could be the next epicenter of a crisis, prompting the Fed’s next round of QE to focus on purchasing those bonds.
While there are ample “beware” signals, it is not yet time to “get out,” and he recommends selectively shorting credit and hedging with long-term zero-coupon bonds instead of taking broad directional short positions.
In an environment of slowing labor and housing markets coupled with a K-shaped economic pattern, it is crucial to monitor the crosscurrents of interest rates, inflation, and exchange rates and respond in phases.

[Related Links…]

• AI Bond Bubble: The Real Protagonist of the Next QE?
• Long-Term Bond Strategy Checklist After the Interest Rate Peak-Out

*Source: [ Maeil Business Newspaper ]

– [홍장원의 불앤베어] “트럼프, 증시상승 원하지 않을 수도” BofA 하트넷 진단

---

---

● Sanctions-Busting Stealth Arms, AWACS Rumor Rocks Northeast Asia

The Cracks in Close North Korea–Russia Ties and the Reorganization of Northeast Asia Post-APEC: Rumors of a “Single Early Warning System”, Payment Bottlenecks, and the Game-Changer of AI Sanctions Monitoring

This article directly covers the following points.
It explains, through data points, why the compensation for Russia–North Korea military transactions is not captured in cash flows, as well as the structure of the actual payment bottleneck.
It verifies the feasibility of the “single early warning system” rumor using a checklist from the perspectives of equipment, operations, and sustainment.
It outlines the background behind China’s increasing temperature difference toward North Korea since APEC, and the signals this sends regarding the global economy, supply chains, inflation, and interest rates.
It separately details the actual operation of key points not well covered in other YouTube channels or news outlets: Russia’s “delay strategy”, rail and port bottlenecks, and data-based AI sanctions monitoring.
It succinctly presents the risk and opportunity factors that investors and companies should immediately check from a geopolitical risk perspective.

Headline News Briefing: What Is Happening Right Now

An increasing distance with both China and Russia is resulting in North Korea’s diplomatic isolation.
Around APEC, China shifted into a management mode concerning the United States and South Korea, and North Korea openly expressed its discomfort with this.
The fact that the transfer of cash, resources, and equipment—cited as compensation for North Korea–Russia military transactions—has not been clearly detected in the data is strengthening the view that “Putin has withheld crucial technology.”
Although there are circulating rumors about the provision of an early warning system, a more realistic scenario involves limited support in the form of technology, data, and parts rather than a physical transfer.

The Tangible and Monetary Flow in North Korea–Russia Transactions: Why Are Payments Not Visible?

The key observation points are the ‘form of payment’ and the ‘logistics bottleneck.’
If it were a cash payment, transaction traces that penetrate the sanctions network should be at least partially detectable; however, so far, cross-border flows of dollars, yuan, or rubles have not been conspicuous.
The influx of refined products, grains, and fertilizers—as a resource-for-resource scenario—into North Korea has also not been seen on a large scale in satellite or port data.
Possible alternatives can be summarized in the following four points.

• Non-monetary payment for materials, parts, and technology.
• “Service credits” in forms such as expanding North Korean labor within Russia.
• Deferred payments mediated by gold bars, precious metals, or crypto assets.
• Long-term netting transactions by paper companies transiting through three countries.
  Among these, the most plausible combination is “small-scale parts/technology + deferred payments,” which is characterized by being very difficult to detect externally.
  In terms of logistics, the bottlenecks of the Hasan–Tumangang single-track railway and the capacity limitations of Rajin port serve as the most realistic constraints on the transaction volume.

Assessing the Viability of a “Single Early Warning System”: A Possibility Checklist

The actual transfer of a Russian A-50U class early warning system faces high difficulties on military, diplomatic, and operational fronts.

• Military constraints.
  The Russian Air Force, actively engaged on the battlefield, has limited available assets, and there is a high risk of leakage of critical sensor, IFF, and datalink technologies.
• Diplomatic costs.
  Providing high-value systems to North Korea without coordination with China would reduce Russia’s bargaining power in Northeast Asia.
• Operation and maintenance.
  Without proper training, spare parts, software, and ongoing support, the platform becomes useless, which would be a conspicuous long-term signal.
  The realistic scenarios are as follows:
• A limited technology package.
  It is likely that components of early warning radar, avionics modules, ground-based early warning system integration technologies, and data set sharing could be provided.
• Data-based cooperation.
  A “capability proxy” approach through the provision of remote sensing data and algorithms could partially substitute for a physical transfer.

China’s Calculated Shift: The Temperature Gap Post-APEC and Its Background

China, taking APEC as an opportunity, is managing its risks with the United States while focusing on stabilizing supply chains and reviving growth.
Although relations with North Korea are a strategic asset, China does not favor military tensions stemming from North Korea that would intensify inflation and supply chain volatility in the global economy.
Consequently, China is employing both incentives and penalties to control North Korea’s hardline actions, while remaining cautious of excessive technology transfers in its North Korea card competition with Russia.

Key Points Not Often Addressed Elsewhere: Russia’s ‘Delay Strategy’ and the Bottlenecks in North Korea, China, and Russia

Russia is inclined to accept ammunition and rockets immediately, while splitting and providing the advanced technologies that North Korea desires in a “partial, delayed, and conditional” manner in order to maintain leverage.
This delay strategy not only induces North Korea to make additional concessions but also enables gray-area support without undermining relations with China.
Physical bottlenecks arise from issues such as the single-track railway, port handling capacity, and insurance or quarantine challenges for ships evading sanctions, causing the “visibility relative to the transaction volume” to appear abnormally low.
Ultimately, the fact that “no money is visible” does not imply an absence of payment; rather, it suggests that the timing and medium of the payments have likely been designed to evade external detection.

Market and Investment Implications: Geopolitical Risk Spreading to Energy, Defense, and Foreign Exchange

Geopolitical risk premiums are first reflected in energy and foreign exchange sectors, and then spread to equities and credit.

• Energy.
  The intensification of Russia’s war efforts increases upward pressure on crude oil and refining margins, which could raise global inflation expectations.
• South Korean and Japanese defense.
  Although it may be positive for long-term order and export momentum, short-term volatility is likely to increase.
• The Korean won and interest rates.
  A risk-off environment may renew downward pressure on the won, and an upward adjustment in inflation expectations could elevate long-term interest rates.
  The scenario-based checks are as follows:
• Base scenario:
  A partial technology transfer with deferred payments may prolong the conflict, but energy prices would remain within a bounded range.
• Upside risk:
  If a large-scale physical transfer of equipment is confirmed, enhanced secondary sanctions from the West could increase supply chain volatility and possibly reheat inflation.
• Downside risk:
  If active buffering by China and a reduction in North Korea–Russia transactions are confirmed, some of the risk premium may be alleviated.

AI Trends: The Technological Stack for Sanctions Monitoring and Early Risk Warning

Data and AI are redefining the landscape of sanctions enforcement.

• Maritime and port OSINT.
  Through AIS spoofing detection, dark vessel pattern analysis, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite imagery, the movement of vessels and cargo can be tracked even at night or in adverse weather conditions.
• Trade data Graph AI.
  Graph neural networks analyze networks of invoices, bills of lading, and corporate registration to identify circumvention payments and netting transactions.
• Signal fusion alerts.
  By fusing heterogeneous data such as gold and precious metal transactions, nighttime operational heat signatures at specific ports, and railway yard occupancy rates, early warnings of anomalies are generated.
  Companies and investors can proactively mitigate supply chain risks by integrating these AI-based early warning systems with vendors, banks, and insurers.

What to Monitor: A 4- to 8-Week Checklist

Monitor whether the nighttime operational levels and heat signatures at Rajin and Cheongjin ports expand beyond seasonal variations.
Check for abnormal influx patterns of gas oil and fertilizers, captured as satellite or customs circumvention signals.
Observe if there are changes in the frequency operation patterns of ground-to-air and maritime surveillance radars.
Monitor whether the dwell times and train formation lengths at rail yards between Russia and North Korea continue to change.
Keep an eye on updates to the West’s secondary sanctions list and the intensification of practical measures in insurance and payment networks.

Policy and Business Insights: Actions to Take Now

• Procurement and supply chains.
  Reduce single-source dependency for raw materials and components linked to Russia and Northeast Asia, and prepare for alternative routes and dual sourcing.
• Finance.
  Reassess hedging strategies in preparation for increased volatility in energy, defense, and the Korean won.
• Compliance and risk management.
  Incorporate Graph AI and maritime OSINT into counterparty assessments to regularly monitor sanction risks.

< Summary >

North Korea–Russia transactions are ongoing, but compensation is likely structured as “partial technology transfer + deferred payments” rather than cash.
The physical transfer of an early warning system appears unlikely, while limited technological and data sharing is considered realistic.
Since APEC, China has not favored North Korea’s excessive military actions, prioritizing supply chain stability and global economic management.
Consequently, geopolitical risks persist and exert influence on energy, defense, the Korean won, and interest rates.
AI-based sanctions monitoring and early risk warning systems become key defensive tools for companies and investors.

[Related Articles…]

• The Impact of Global Geopolitical Risks on Interest Rates in 2025
• Innovations in AI Sanctions Monitoring: The Combination of Maritime Data and Graph AI

*Source: [ 달란트투자 ]

– “꼴랑 조기경보기 한 대?” 푸틴한테 또 속은 김정은. 북한 완전히 개털됐다｜이영종 센터장 2부

---

---