● Tesla Reborn, AI Robot Empire Set to Dominate

Wall Street Reassesses Tesla from ‘Automobile’ to ‘AI+Robotics Platform’: The Real Meaning Behind the $508~$509 Price Target

This article focuses on how Wall Street has begun to evaluate Tesla through a new lens—not simply as an electric car company but as an “AI platform” that includes FSD, robo-taxi, humanoid (Optimus), and energy.

The background behind Stifel and TD Cowen’s price targets of $508–$509 is discussed, along with the robo-taxi roadmap, the evolution of inference in FSD v14, and the point at which Optimus has officially been incorporated into the valuation model.

It also addresses changes in institutional holdings such as those by Nomura, which now sees Tesla as a core portfolio stock, an increase in institutional ownership estimated at 66%, as well as cost structure changes amid supply chain risk (reports on substitution of Chinese parts), US-China tariffs, inflation, interest rates, and recession risks.

Some of the most crucial points not covered elsewhere include the robo-taxi unit economics, the accounting treatment (deferred revenue) of FSD subscriptions, the bottleneck of inference cost/compute, the real timeline for regulatory approvals, and interpreting Optimus’s initial internal demand in numerical terms.

Also, let’s take a look at the signals that the short controversy between Elon Musk and Bill Gates gives to market sentiment and US stock volatility.

Wall Street Price Target Rises: It’s the ‘Valuation Framework’ That Has Changed, Not the Numbers

Stifel raised its price target for Tesla from $483 to $508, with the key rationale being the realization of an AI-led business segment rather than car sales alone.

First, the robo-taxi roadmap has become more concrete.

The report suggests that by the end of 2025, Tesla could expand to 8–10 cities and that initial commercialization may accelerate in friendly states such as Arizona, Nevada, and Florida, aiming for driverless operation without safety personnel in Austin this year.

Second, there is mention of enhanced ‘inference capability’ in FSD v14.

The technology has evolved from mere perception to “situational understanding and prediction,” and its camera vision plus transformer-based decision-making is nearing human-like judgment.

Third, it is a reorganization of pricing strategy.

Even with changes in tax credit policies, the launch of the Standard versions of Model 3 and Model Y has maintained the utility of the 300-mile range while securing price competitiveness, thereby reducing reliance on subsidies.

Fourth, there is an update to the performance model.

Stifel has raised its 2025 EBITDA estimate to approximately $14.9 billion and $19.5 billion in 2026, partially incorporating contributions from FSD, robo-taxi, and Optimus.

The key point is that Optimus has been embedded as a tangible value element in the model from the start.

Price Target Raised After On-Site Inspection: TD Cowen $509

TD Cowen, after a tour of the Gigafactory Texas, confirmed operational efficiency and economies of scale, setting its price target at $509.

They noted that the 4680 battery production flow, body/platform integration, and assembly line operation is lowering the cost curve.

The core message is that Tesla’s execution has been underappreciated rather than overhyped.

Changes in Institutional Flow: Re-entering as a ‘Core Portfolio’

Nomura has elevated Tesla to one of its top 10 core assets in its overall portfolio, reportedly purchasing an additional 47,674 shares for a total holding of over 1.17 million shares.

The valuation is estimated at approximately $370 million, with a weighting of around 1%.

Several asset managers such as Brighton Johnson, Revol Well Partners, Byson Wells, AGM National Trust, and FAS Wells are among those increasing their stakes.

Tesla’s institutional ownership is estimated to be around 66% of the total tradable shares and is on the rise, according to data being shared in the market.

Despite concerns over high multiples, institutions are buying in because the premium for the ‘AI+Robotics Platform option’ rather than just an automobile is beginning to be factored into the price.

Musk vs. Gates: The Short Position Controversy and Market Sentiment

Elon Musk sent a warning message on X to Bill Gates, saying, “Close your long-short on Tesla that you’ve held for a long time.”

Some have speculated, based on SEC documents, that the Gates Foundation might have been covering Tesla shorts using funds generated from liquidating about 65% (approximately $8.8 billion) of its Microsoft holdings.

This connection has not been officially confirmed, and the size of the short position is also based on market estimates.

Nevertheless, this issue has served to highlight Musk’s confidence in an upward cycle and has influenced market volatility.

Supply Chain Restructuring: Reports on the Shift from Chinese Parts and Tariff Risks

The Wall Street Journal reported that Tesla is gradually transitioning from using Chinese parts in vehicles built at its US factory to domestic components, with a target period of about two years.

GM and Stellantis are also reported to be adopting similar guidelines to reduce Chinese-related risks.

However, there is no official confirmation from Tesla, and since the reports are based on anonymous sources, conclusions should be made cautiously.

Macro factors such as US-China tariffs, supply chain diversification, inflationary pressures, and capital costs at high interest rates directly impact costs, margins, and inventory strategies.

In the medium to long term, increasing the localization of manufacturing in North America will reduce tariff and geopolitical risks and help mitigate cost volatility, although short-term margins may suffer from transition costs.

The Most Important Points: The New Framework in Numbers and Overlooked Aspects

The essence is the shift in the valuation framework.

Past: Focused on the car company P/E ratio.

Now: A Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) approach that breaks down Auto (hardware) + Software (FSD subscription/license) + Network (robo-taxi platform) + Energy (Megapack/VPP) + Robotics (Optimus).

Deferred revenue of FSD subscriptions.

FSD is recognized over a dispersed period due to subscription/package payment terms.

Monthly subscription revenue is high-margin, and the larger the cumulative deferred revenue balance, the more predictable it becomes.

Robo-taxi unit economics (scenario analysis).

Example assumptions: vehicle cost of $35,000–$40,000, annual mileage of 60,000–80,000 km, revenue of $1.0–$1.5 per mile, variable cost of $0.25–$0.35 per mile, and utilization rate of 35–50% which could result in a payback period of 12–18 months.

Actual figures may vary significantly based on city-specific fares, insurance, and depreciation, so careful attention is required.

Inference costs and compute bottlenecks.

As the model size increases, inference power consumption and costs within the vehicle also rise.

This is why Tesla is opting for strategies such as model slimming, on-device optimization, and a mixed approach with Dojo/NVIDIA.

Reducing the inference cost per mile is key to boosting robo-taxi margins.

The differential speed of regulatory approvals is a catalyst for valuation.

States like Arizona, Nevada, and Florida are friendly, while California and New York are more conservative.

Once driverless operations are stabilized in the initial 3–5 states, network effects will rapidly lower costs as cities are added.

Optimus’s initial demand starts from internal ‘insourcing.’

Initially, it will be deployed for in-plant logistics and assembly assistance to replace safety and repetitive tasks, and externally it is likely to spread first in specific industries (e.g., warehouses, retail back rooms).

ASP and margins can significantly improve along the production learning curve.

Risk checks.

Delays due to accidents or regulatory setbacks, model stability, insurance costs, intensifying competition (e.g., Waymo, Cruise, Baidu), re-escalation of tariffs/inflation, and high capital costs due to prolonged high interest rates are discount factors.

Timeline and Checklist: What to Watch For

Short-term (next 6–12 months): Expansion of FSD v14 regions, scope/requirements for testing without safety personnel, updates to the regulatory approval map, stabilization of 4680 production, Megapack shipments/backlog, and changes in pricing strategy.

Medium-term (12–24 months): Whether the initial paid robo-taxi service launches in selected regions, trends in the deferred revenue balance of FSD subscriptions, expanded contributions from energy segment sales/margins, and signals from the commencement of the Optimus pilot production line.

Performance points: Software revenue/gross profit, FSD take rate, energy gross margin, guidance on compute/robotics CAPEX, and weekly regulatory approval updates.

Scenario View (Not Advice)

Upside: Early commercialization in multiple states, a surge in FSD subscriptions, improved energy margins, external contracts for the Optimus pilot → multiple expansion.

Base: Limited regional commercialization, gradual increase in subscriptions, stable growth in energy, cost offset from supply chain risk → gradual re-rating.

Downside: Regulatory delays/incident issues, inflation re-escalation and sustained high interest rates, or recession weakening demand → multiple contraction.

Fact Check and Cautions

Reports of the switch to Chinese parts should not be assumed confirmed until Tesla provides official confirmation.

The connection between Gates’ short position and the sale of MSFT shares is speculative, and the interpretation of SEC documents should be approached with caution.

Institutional ownership and individual asset manager purchase data may vary by period, so always refer to the latest filings.

One-Line Q&A

Q. What is the core of the $508–$509 price target?

A. It reflects the start of incorporating a “new framework” that aggregates automobiles with AI, robotics, and software.

Q. Why are institutions increasing their stake now?

A. They believe that the robo-taxi/Optimus options and high-margin software can elevate long-term multiples.

Q. What impact does the supply chain transition have on margins?

A. Although short-term transition costs may rise, it can reduce tariff and geopolitical risks and subsequently lower medium- to long-term volatility.

Q. How do macro factors affect the company?

A. Inflation, interest rate trends, and recession risks directly impact demand and capital costs, so it is essential to check quarterly guidance.

< Summary >

Wall Street has revalued Tesla from an electric car company to an “AI+Robotics Platform,” setting a price target of $508–$509.

The rationale includes a tangible robo-taxi roadmap, enhanced inference performance in FSD v14, a restructured pricing strategy, and increased incorporation of energy and Optimus into the model.

Nomura and other institutions are increasing their holdings, while supply chain and tariff risks are being managed concurrently.

The key is the link between unit economics and regulatory approval speed, lowering inference costs, and translating deferred revenue from FSD subscriptions into performance.

Macro variables such as inflation, interest rates, and recession risks remain factors, and reports pending official confirmation should be interpreted conservatively.

[Related Articles…]

Tesla’s Robo-Taxi Era: Conditions for Explosive Earnings Leverage

Global Peak-out in Interest Rates and the US Stock AI Supercycle

This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.

The key figures and plans are based on reports, market coverage, and corporate communications but are subject to change.

Be sure to cross-check with the latest filings and earnings releases.

*Source: [ 오늘의 테슬라 뉴스 ]

– 월가가 테슬라 기준을 완전히 바꿨다! 목표주가 ‘$508’이 단순 숫자가 아닌 진짜 이유

---

● Driverless Cybertruck Sparks Market Frenzy, AI5 Revolution Reprices Tesla

Tesla Cybertruck “Europe FSD” Captured, Institutional Valuation Rebalanced, and Investor Perspectives That Will Change the Next Year

Key Points to Check Out in Today’s Article

• The significance of the Cybertruck FSD driving footage captured for the first time in Prague, Europe
• The changes in Tesla valuation by institutions such as Stifel and TD Cowen, and a breakdown of the $508 target price
• The impact of FSD v13/v14 performance that surpasses regulations, and the implications of the “elimination of safety drivers”
• Musk’s hint: the economics of the data center “Cortex 2” and the ultra-efficient AI5 chip
• The revenue model created by robo-taxi, insurance, and manufacturing innovations, and the logic behind the earnings jump in 2025-2026
• A point other channels miss: probability-weighted option valuation and a regulator-user driven expansion strategy

Institutional Valuation Update: Dissecting the Structure of the $508 Target Price

Stifel has raised Tesla’s target price from $483 to $508.

The upgrade is based on raised operating profit estimates for 2025-2026 and the reflected option values of FSD, robo-taxi, and Optimus.

Stifel estimates operating profits of $14.8 billion in 2025 and $19.5 billion in 2026, significantly boosting the 2026 outlook.

A breakdown of the target price shows $134 from the 2026 EBITDA multiple, $186 from FSD, $158 from robo-taxi, and $29 from Optimus, totaling $508.

The key point is that the future software/service value is already being fundamentally reflected in the valuation.

They noted as a risk that the reduction of US subsidies could continue from Q4 this year to Q2 next year.

Although the lower-priced models have become relatively cheaper, they are rated as neutral due to not meeting market expectations.

Optimus is reflected as a positive factor given that version 3 will be unveiled in Q1 2026, and a production line for 1 million units is planned by the end of 2026.

TD Cowen reaffirmed their buy recommendation based on the experiential performance of FSD v14 and manufacturing innovations at the Austin plant.

Nomura-affiliated funds have increased their holdings by purchasing approximately 47,000 additional shares, indicating preliminary signs of institutional fund inflow.

Despite macroeconomic variables such as interest rates and inflation volatility, the structural growth story centered on software is rebalancing valuations.

Cybertruck FSD Captured in Prague, Europe: Field Evidence Changing the Narrative

A driving video of the Cybertruck equipped with the latest version of FSD was observed in Prague, Czech Republic.

The explanation included that the FSD was engaged without a navigation destination, and it is unconfirmed whether it was an official test.

The scene of a large pickup seamlessly moving through a narrow alley reduced concerns about its suitability for European urban environments.

The scene where the autonomous driving system naturally clears the lane for an approaching ambulance is interpreted as a safety signal for real-world use.

Although the commercial approval for European FSD and formal certification for the Cybertruck are separate issues, the key message is that the technology is already overcoming the challenges specific to Europe.

FSD Performance Outpacing Regulations and Data-Driven Expansion

FSD v13 demonstrated near robo-taxi level driving completeness, and further improvements are being observed in v14.

Cumulative autonomous driving data is estimated at 6.4 billion miles, with urban driving exceeding 2.3 billion miles, rapidly enhancing learning precision.

Statistics indicate that using FSD reduces the frequency of accidents by seven times, concretizing the potential for integration with the insurance industry.

In some communities in Israel and Europe, petitions for deregulation have emerged, and in Japan, preparations such as hiring operators for autopilot vehicles have been observed.

In the United States, with Austin already moving towards the elimination of safety drivers, competition with Waymo in service coverage is expected to intensify.

This trend suggests a shift away from the traditional model where politicians approve technology, towards a structure where technology and the user base drive regulatory changes.

Musk’s Hint: The Economics of Data Center “Cortex 2” and the AI5 Chip

Musk mentioned, “The reason AI investments didn’t seem high was that training was not the bottleneck.”

FSD has approached a safety level that is superior to human performance even with the current infrastructure, and he hinted that a data center called “Cortex 2” is being prepared for large-scale training of Optimus.

The next-generation AI5 chip is noted to cost about one-tenth of what NVIDIA charges for equivalent performance (estimated at $3,000 to $4,000).

The target power consumption is around 250W, suggesting that it could be far more energy efficient compared to power consumption levels of 1000-1200W class chips.

This combination is expected to drastically reduce the TCO (total cost of ownership) for training and inference, acting as a catalyst for the economic viability of robo-taxi and humanoid robots.

CyberCab and Manufacturing Innovation: Realizing the Revenue Model

Massive casting has been captured in Texas, and preparations for CyberCab are underway with full-scale production expected to begin in April.

Once the elimination of safety drivers is initiated in Austin, the same vehicle will transition into a model generating revenue from hardware, software, and services simultaneously.

If software subscriptions, robo-taxi fees, and Tesla Insurance’s dynamic pricing are combined, the LTV per vehicle could surpass that of traditional automakers.

Insurance company Lemonade has indicated a willingness to lower premiums if the FSD API is opened, which implies that safety data-based insurance can support margins even in periods of high interest rates and inflation.

News Brief: A Summary of Today’s Trends

Stifel raised the target price to $508.

TD Cowen reaffirmed their buy recommendation after confirming FSD and manufacturing innovations.

Nomura-affiliated funds expanded their positions with an additional purchase of 47,000 shares.

The Cybertruck FSD driving video captured in Prague signals its suitability for European urban environments.

With the imminent transition to eliminating safety drivers in Austin, the commercial phase is accelerating.

Expectations are high for improved TCO for training and inference with data center “Cortex 2” and the AI5 chip.

The Most Important Point That Other Channels Miss

• Probability-weighted option valuation: FSD and robo-taxi should be weighted by the probability of commercialization in stages rather than being viewed as binary events.
• Regulator-user “two-way drive”: As seen in Europe and Japan, user demand can push for deregulation, a structure that should be reflected in the go-to-market strategy.
• Reevaluation of profitability based on power and cost: With AI5’s 250W-level power consumption and low-cost structure, the margin per mile can be reset by lowering inference costs.
• Insurance and financial synergies: When safety data is collateralized, lower insurance premiums and lease rates can reduce the total cost of ownership and drive the demand curve.
• Macroeconomic resilience: Despite fluctuations in interest rates and inflation, the increasing proportion of software subscription and service revenue acts as a stabilizer for valuations.

12-Month Roadmap: A Period Where Vision Translates into Profit

0-3 months: Transition toward eliminating safety drivers in Austin, refinement of v14, and gradual expansion of robo-taxi service areas.

3-6 months: Initial production of CyberCab, accumulation of operational data, and visualization of pilot projects with insurance/API partners.

6-12 months: Expansion into cities, tuning of profitability, and an increase in operational miles leading to an improved revenue mix of software/services.

Since regulations may open non-linearly by city or country, it is crucial to model the economic viability of partial commercialization first.

Risks and Checkpoints

Regulatory delays: Consider differentiating between base, neutral, and bullish scenarios based on the varying pace of expansion across cities and countries.

AI infrastructure ramp-up: It is necessary to track the timeline for Cortex 2, stabilization of AI5 mass production, and CAPEX for power and cooling.

Demand/Price: In a macroeconomic environment, pricing strategy and margin management are critical, with inflation and interest rate paths acting as variables.

Competition: Comparing service coverage, rates, and regulatory negotiation power with Waymo, Cruise, and others is important.

Investment Perspective Checklist

• Track changes in the weighting of the software/service breakdown items in institutional reports.
• Monitor the pace of eliminating safety drivers by city, as well as operational data (event rates, MTBF).
• Pay attention to changes in insurance rates, API open partnership developments, and ARPU from subscriptions.
• Review updates on the power/cost metrics for the AI5 chip and the ramp-up rate for the data center.
• Reflect the additive/subtractive effects of macroeconomic fluctuations (global economy, interest rates, inflation, and macroeconomic policies) on valuations.

< Summary >

The capture of Cybertruck FSD driving footage in Prague confirms the field applicability of the technology.

Stifel set a target price of $508, with the option values of FSD, robo-taxi, and Optimus being the key factors.

Musk hinted that FSD was not the bottleneck and that Cortex 2 and the AI5 chip are being prepared for Optimus.

The imminent transition to eliminating safety drivers in Austin paves the way for a revenue model combining insurance, subscriptions, and robo-taxi services.

The most important points are the probability-weighted option valuation and the user-driven expansion strategy that drives regulatory change.

[Related Articles…]

• Tesla Robo-Taxi, a Core Summary of the Expansion Roadmap in Major Cities
• Analysis on the Synergy between the Optimus Production Line and the AI5 Chip

*Source: [ 허니잼의 테슬라와 일론 ]

– 테슬라, 최초 목격된 사이버트럭 ‘유럽 FSD’! 기관들의 테슬라 밸류에이션 변화 트렌드. 지금 가장 중요한 것은 1년 뒤 평가될 투자자의 안목입니다.

---

● Epstein Shockwave – Market Panic, Bitcoin Crash, AI Risk

Appstein Butterfly Effect? 2026 Global Economic Outlook, 5 Risks and Strategies That Could Shake the U.S. Stock Market, Bitcoin, and AI

Preview of Key Included Contents

It clearly delineates the boundary between facts and assertions regarding why U.S. political risk triggered simultaneous adjustments in Bitcoin and the U.S. stock market.

It outlines scenarios addressing how Congressional and judicial issues that may arise within the next one to four weeks could affect the global economic outlook, dollar strength, and the trajectory of rate cuts.

It interprets the implications of controversies surrounding Bitcoin’s seed funding and Wall Street intervention for credibility and liquidity, connecting them to early signals from the bond market.

It presents industry-specific analyses on how the AI trend, data center capex, and risk premiums from cybersecurity and governance might be re-evaluated.

It reveals rarely-discussed “chain pathways” and checklists, linking together benchmark interest rates, inflation, the dollar index, credit spreads, and ETF capital flows.

Today’s News in a Nutshell

Main points: Some U.S. politicians and media revived discussions on ‘the disclosure of documents related to Epstein’ and ‘allegations involving key figures,’ with concerns that policy uncertainty is being reflected in risk assets.

Analysis indicates a typical risk-off sequence where cryptocurrencies first waver, followed by increased volatility in the U.S. stock market.

Allegations related to former President Trump remain at the ‘allegation’ stage and have not been legally established. However, if Congressional disclosure pressure intensifies, concerns about a policy vacuum → weakening consumer sentiment → increased stock market volatility could come into play.

Bitcoin is facing psychological pressure as the narrative of ‘decentralization’ clashes with allegations of ‘Wall Street-engineered intervention,’ potentially resulting in a discount on its premium.

Facts vs. Assertions: How Much Has the Market Priced In?

Established fact: Global financial markets price in uncertainty. Irrespective of the veracity of the content, Congressional and judicial issues have become ingredients contributing to stock and cryptocurrency volatility.

Assertions/Allegations: Specific emails and circumstantial connections between certain individuals fall within the realm of media reports and political claims and cannot be regarded as factual until final legal judgments are rendered.

Investment perspective: Rather than the truth of the allegations, the focus is on the direct pricing impact of possibilities such as policy vacuums, a re-emergence of dollar strength, and delays or changes in the rate-cut trajectory.

Market Shock Pathways: Why Is It So Volatile?

Policy Uncertainty: When the risk of a power vacuum emerges, questions arise over the consistency of the federal government’s fiscal and trade policies. The U.S. stock market despises uncertainty, and volatility premiums rise instantly.

Consumer Slowdown Channel: With about 65% of U.S. GDP driven by consumption, political stress may weigh on consumer confidence indexes and card payment data, exerting downward pressure.

Dollar/Bonds: In a risk-off scenario, either a stronger dollar or a decline in long-term bond yields (or, in cases of credit concerns, a rise in yields in certain segments) typically serves as a leading indicator. An expansion in credit spreads often signals stock movements one to three weeks in advance.

Cryptocurrency Singularity: When regulatory or governance risks emerge, the sequence tends to be a reduction in leveraged positions → forced liquidations → selling off in the spot market → ETF capital outflows, quickly spreading credit contraction.

Three Scenarios and Probabilistic Thinking

Best (Stabilization/Repair): Limited disclosure of the allegations with confirmation of policy continuity. Expectations for rate cuts remain, dollar strength eases, and volatility normalizes. Growth stocks and AI infrastructure get reappraised.

Base (Mild Turbulence Followed by Sustained Low-Level Noise): Partial disclosure of documents with prolonged political disputes. Although the rate-cut trajectory is maintained, uncertainty regarding its speed and timing increases. Defensive stocks and large-cap names with relative strength may gain.

Worst (Policy Vacuum/Impeachment/Recount-Level Confusion): Major policy delays, a sharp drop in consumer sentiment, excessive dollar strength, and a rapid expansion in credit spreads. Recession fears are reignited, potentially leading to a “flattening” of the curve between short- and long-term rates.

Message: The market prices in “the duration of uncertainty” rather than the veracity of the news. The longer it lasts, the more discounts PERs, and sectors with clear cash flows receive a premium.

Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies: What to Watch

Narrative Risk: The collision between the narrative of decentralization and allegations of Wall Street intervention could rapidly reduce the premium if the narrative falters.

Liquidity: Key factors include net ETF inflows/outflows, funding rates in the derivatives market, and changes in the market capitalization of stablecoins. Outflows of stablecoins serve as an early signal of market contraction.

Structure Over Levels: Rather than focusing on price levels, prioritize structural indicators such as the scale and timing of forced liquidations, basis differentials between exchanges, and Kimchi Premium/reverse premiums.

Strategy: Focus on the spot market, minimize leverage, and interpret excessively high (abnormally high) DeFi yields as reverse risk signals.

Stock Market Strategy: Which Stocks to Buy

Core: Large-cap, high-quality growth stocks with robust cash flows, global market share, and pricing power. They maintain visible profitability even amid policy noise.

AI Infrastructure: Data center power/chiller systems, HBM, storage, network switches, and cybersecurity. Even if there are concerns over delays in CAPEX, the underlying demand remains solid.

Defensive/High Dividend: Essential consumer goods and utilities with companies that can pass on price hikes. They reduce portfolio volatility in turbulent times.

Risk Management: During volatile periods, consider dollar-cost averaging, clarifying target weights and maximum loss thresholds (for example, -10~12%). Base your sell triggers not on price but on the collapse of the investment thesis.

Bonds and FX: Look at the Leading Signals First

U.S. Treasuries: As policy noise increases, the volatility of the 10-year note rises. A sudden surge in the MOVE index often precedes a rise in the VIX, the stock volatility index.

Credit: An expansion in the High-Yield to Treasuries spread serves as a warning of economic and liquidity issues. It signals when it may be time to reduce beta exposure and move toward quality assets.

Dollar Strength: This absorbs global liquidity, leading to relative strength in the U.S. stock market and adjustments in emerging markets. It is important to review the hedge ratios for foreign exchange risk.

Points for Reassessing the AI Trend

Governance Premium: Big-tech companies expanding their investments in AI safety and compliance incur costs, but these investments serve as a premium factor in times of regulatory uncertainty.

Quality of Demand: Enterprise AI transition demand is more robust than advertising or consumer spending during economic slowdowns. The cloud, data, and MLOps sectors present higher earnings visibility.

Energy/Power: Investment in data center power capacity is structural. Companies with long-term power contracts, grid infrastructure, and thermal management solutions stand to benefit.

Cybersecurity: As political and social conflicts intensify, the expected costs of security breaches rise. Recurring security revenues are inherently defensive.

Seven Key Points Rarely Covered Elsewhere

1) The essence of volatility is ‘policy continuity risk.’ More important than the news content is the duration over which it persists, which significantly affects PERs.

2) Monitor credits and the dollar before stocks. The direction of the high-yield spread and the DXY serve as leading indicators.

3) Observe consumption data on a daily basis. Daily trends in card payments and online retail can be faster indicators than the Conference Board Index.

4) Systemic risk in crypto first appears in stablecoins. A decline in market capitalization signals an overall contraction in liquidity.

5) AI beneficiaries gain not through individual stocks but through the entire chain. Bind together the value chain of semiconductors, power, cooling, security, networks, and software.

6) In times of policy noise, sectors with supplier advantages perform better. Check for pricing power and contract structures.

7) Diversify risk via hedging. Splitting hedges across sectors, currencies, and durations increases efficiency relative to cost.

Checklist: What Investors Should Monitor This Month

Rate Cut Expectation Trajectory: Look for changes in wording in dot plots and the Federal Reserve’s communications.

Dollar Strength/Weakness: Monitor whether the DXY breaks direction near the 100 level.

Credit Spread: If the HY-OAS spread expands by more than 50bps suddenly, it is time to reduce stock beta exposure.

VIX and MOVE: Watch for a surge in the VIX following a sharp rise in the MOVE index.

ETF Flows: Observe the directional changes in cash inflows/outflows for stocks, bonds, and cryptocurrencies.

Political Event Timeline: Note the scheduling of document disclosures and hearings in Congress (reflect only confirmed news).

Portfolio Playbook

1–2 weeks (Noise): Increase cash holdings by 5–10%, minimize leverage, and strictly adhere to stop-loss rules.

1–3 months (Awaiting Clarity): Build a core portfolio focused on large-cap blue chips, AI infrastructure, and cybersecurity, while expanding emerging market exposure once dollar weakness is confirmed.

6–12 months (Restoration of Policy Continuity): Strengthen a growth basket with semiconductors, power/utilities, industrial automation, and cloud software.

Risk Disclosure and Cautions

Some content related to specific individuals or events in this text is based on media reports and political claims and remains unconfirmed through legal judgment.

Final responsibility for investment decisions lies with the investor, and this article does not constitute investment advice.

< Summary >

U.S. political risk is amplifying the uncertainty premium, leading to simultaneous shocks in Bitcoin and the U.S. stock market.

The key factor is not the substance of the allegations but rather how long the uncertainty endures. The longer it lasts, the more pronounced the dollar strength and credit spread expansion become, leading to discounted PERs.

The strategy is to maintain a core portfolio focused on large-cap quality stocks, AI infrastructure, and cybersecurity, while monitoring credit, the dollar, and ETF flows, and reducing leverage.

For cryptocurrencies, key indicators include stablecoin market capitalization, ETF capital flows, and reductions in derivative leverage.

Considering the interplay between the global economic outlook, rate cut trajectory, inflation, and dollar strength, a balanced approach over one to three months is effective.

[Related Articles…]

Five Signals of U.S. Stock Market Volatility and Rate Cut Expectations

Bitcoin ETF Capital Inflows and the Dynamics of Dollar Strength

*Source: [ Jun’s economy lab ]

– 앱스타인 나비효과로 무너지는 증시, 비트코인(ft.트럼프)

---