● Tesla Unleashes RoboTaxi Blitz, iPhone Users First – Arizona Greenlights Statewide Launch

Tesla Robo-Taxi ‘Full Access’ Impact Summary: Austin & Bay Area Live Service, Statewide Approval in Arizona, the Real Intention Behind iPhone First Access, and Investment & Regulatory Checkpoints

The key points immediately evident in this update are threefold.

First, the signal of “full access” where anyone can now request a robo-taxi via the app in Austin and the Bay Area.

Second, the official approval of TNC (Transportation Network Company) registration in Arizona, enabling the service to commence without city restrictions.

Third, the significance of prioritizing iPhone (iOS) access in terms of technology/data strategy and the shift in revenue models.

This is summarized from the perspective of economic and AI trends, covering valuation changes on Wall Street, FSD adoption rate projections, regulatory risks, and unit economics.

Headline News Summary

According to the original article, Tesla has ended its invitation-based beta and has “effectively” opened up robo-taxi requests to iOS users.

In Austin, while a safety driver is still onboard, the range is being expanded such that FSD is handling the majority of the driving during actual operations.

In the Bay Area (San Francisco, Palo Alto, San Jose), although there is no Level 4 unmanned permit due to CPUC regulations, the service is operating under a “supervised ride-hailing” model.

Arizona has set the conditions for service commencement across the state with TNC registration approval, enabling operations in cities without restrictions.

Analyst Stipel has raised the target price for Tesla to $508 by significantly reflecting the value of FSD/robo-taxi, assuming a 15-20% FSD subscription adoption rate for 2026-2027.

Important: The above content is a summary based on the original article and related reports; please verify the actual access range and available regions within the app with the latest information and official announcements from state and local governments.

Regional Status: Where and How to Ride

Austin (Texas): Safety drivers are present, with service expanded to include both urban and highway segments. Typically, the passenger sits in the front passenger seat, although in some situations, the driver’s seat may also have oversight.

Bay Area (California): Operates under a “supervised ride-hailing” model without a Level 4 unmanned permit, requiring that a person’s hand remains on the steering wheel.

Arizona: With TNC registration approved, service can commence without restrictions in cities like Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Tucson. Its straightforward climate and road environment make it a favorable testbed for rapid data accumulation and expansion.

iPhone Priority: Due to the dominance of iPhone in the U.S. smartphone market and the efficiency in bug fixes and log collection within a single ecosystem, the service is rolling out on iOS first, with a strong possibility of expansion to Android after stabilization.

Waymo vs. Tesla: Different Strategies, Different Metrics

Waymo: Operates in designated areas within specific cities with Level 4 unmanned services, optimizing for safety and regulatory compliance under restrictions on speed and road types.

Tesla: Aims for a broader service range (including highways) but initially operates in a “supervised” mode, leveraging a camera+AI stack to accelerate scalability and the data flywheel effect.

Conclusion: Rather than a binary of having or not having an unmanned permit, the key competitive edge lies in a portfolio covering coverage, speed, learning data, and regulatory cooperation.

Data Strategy Behind iPhone First Access

A uniform resolution/sensor, API, and location system ensure high reproducibility of logs and error replication, accelerating initial quality convergence.

The high U.S. customer reach of iPhone and the minimization of operational complexity work together to reduce CAC (customer acquisition cost) and bug-fix expenses simultaneously.

To reduce data bias risk, an expansion to Android after stabilization is essential, as diversification in cities, devices, and driving patterns is crucial for model generalization.

Wall Street Perspective and Valuation Points

Stipel: Suggests a target of $508 by aggregating values of approximately $130 for core automotive+energy, $185 for FSD, and $160 for robo-taxi (as per the original article).

FSD Adoption Rate: Assumes 15-20% for 2026-2027, with accelerated transition based on experiential data playing a key role in the argument.

From an investment perspective: As the global economic and interest rate regime shifts, the sensitivity to multiples increases, making the growth of FSD subscriptions and the timing of the unmanned transition critical triggers for stock volatility.

Unit Economics: Why Unmanned Operation Is the Starting Point for the ‘Business’

The moment a safety driver is onboard, the hourly labor cost dominates the cost structure.

Example: With an hourly wage of $25-35, a vehicle utilization rate of 40-60%, and when including insurance, vehicle depreciation, charging, and maintenance, the cost per mile can easily exceed $1.

As full unmanned operation approaches, the cost per mile could converge to $0.5 or even lower, creating a price competitive edge over Uber/taxi services and enabling 24-hour operations.

Once price competitiveness is secured, demand elasticity increases, and simultaneous productivity innovations such as reduced urban traffic congestion, supplemental public transportation, and labor market restructuring occur.

Regulations and Risks: 5 Key Points to Check Now

Permit Status: Different levels of unmanned Level 4, supervised ride-hailing, and data sharing requirements exist by state and city, so review the service terms in the app and relevant regulatory notices.

Insurance/Liability: In the transition to unmanned services, accident liability, insurance premiums, and product liability directly affect fares and unit economics.

Data Regulations: Regulations regarding the storage and utilization of video and location data are critical for the speed and quality of AI learning.

Pricing Policies: TNC regulations, urban congestion fees, and airport pickup rules can influence initial profitability.

Interest Rates/Capital Costs: In an inflationary environment with fixed policy rates, the cost of financing CAPEX for vehicles, charging infrastructure, and computing (training) becomes a critical variable in investment strategy.

Key Points Not Often Covered by Other Channels

Revenue Recognition Structure: A shift from being primarily vehicle sales-based to a MaaS (Mobility as a Service) subscription and usage fee model will change the seasonality of revenues, margin smoothing, and cashflow profiles.

App Store Policies: Prioritizing iOS immediately impacts payment systems, commission fees, and the operation of ride ticket UIs/back-office systems.

Power/Charging CAPEX: Scaling up robo-taxi operations might face bottlenecks in rapid charging turnover and grid connectivity, with energy storage (ESS) and demand response integration offering hidden ROIC leverage.

Data Network Effects: As cities increase, the exponential growth in the collection of “rare cases” accelerates model learning.

Policy Regime Changes: In an environment of global economic uncertainty and persistent interest rates, consistent regulations and public partnerships are the fastest routes to reducing multiple discounts.

Checklist for Consumers, Investors, and Startups

Consumers: Check the service area, pricing, and safety policies in the app and provide feedback to directly contribute to ride experience improvements.

Investors: Track FSD subscription conversion rates, the speed of obtaining unmanned permits, trends in cost per mile/fares, and charging infrastructure CAPEX with utilization rates.

Startups/Local Governments: Opportunities lie in hub-based charging, car wash, and maintenance, as well as operational areas such as airport or large mall pickup zones, and data governance and simulation tool chains.

Fact-Checking Points (Quick Verification Methods)

App Usage: Directly verify whether your region is available for ride requests and check the geofence boundaries within the iOS app.

State Government Announcements: Check for updates regarding Arizona TNC registration, city-specific operational notices, and updates from the CPUC in Texas and California.

On-site Videos/Reviews: Compare the safety driver policies and the proportion of highway driving through ride reviews in Austin and the Bay Area.

Economic & AI Trend Ripple Effects

From a global economic perspective, robo-taxis can enhance urban mobility productivity and contribute to potential growth rates.

Even though a reduction in per-unit costs in an inflation/interest rate environment may partially stabilize transportation prices, significant regional differences exist initially due to regulations and insurance costs.

The shorter the AI learning cycle, the quicker service quality converges, enhancing network externalities, and in the long term, establishing the core axis of the mobility data economy.

One-Line Conclusion

With the signal of “full access” and state-wide approval in Arizona, Tesla is shifting gears from an automotive sales company to a service company that manages mobility itself.

The timing of unmanned operations and the FSD subscription adoption rate will be critical determinants for future valuation and global expansion.

< Summary >

Robo-taxi requests have been “effectively” opened up for iOS users in the Austin & Bay Area.

Approval of TNC registration in Arizona has set the conditions for service commencement without city restrictions.

Prioritizing iPhone is a strategic choice aimed at accelerating data convergence and bug fixes.

Wall Street highly values FSD/robo-taxi, assuming a 15-20% adoption rate (’26–’27).

Achieving unmanned operation is a watershed moment for unit economics and price competitiveness, with interest rates, regulations, and insurance being the key risks.

[Related Articles…]

Summary: How Robo-Taxis Affect Inflation and Interest Rates

Waymo vs. Tesla: Comparing Autonomous Driving Business Models

*Source: [ 오늘의 테슬라 뉴스 ]

– 테슬라 로보택시 전면 개방! 초대 없는 완전 개방 선언… 오스틴·베이 이어 ‘애리조나 공식 승인’까지 터졌다 !

---

● Tesla RoboTaxi Avalanche, Nvidia Moment Ignites

Tesla RoboTaxi Full-Scale Launch Signal, Possibility of Triggering the ‘Nvidia Moment’ and Comprehensive Overview of the Global Expansion Roadmap

This article contains three components.
Immediate news such as the app rollout across the US and Canada and the approval of public roads in Arizona (based on the original text), valuation triggers that could lead to a 30-40 fold fleet expansion and an ‘Nvidia Moment’, and investment perspective key points from robo-taxi unit economics and regulatory timelines to portfolio strategies.
In particular, it summarizes the often-overlooked “true meaning of reduced wait times” and the “re-evaluation of tech stocks driven by per-mile cost gaps”.

Today’s Key Briefing (News Format)

• The robo-taxi app has been officially rolled out to everyone (based on the original text) in the US and Canada, and visitors to the Bay Area and Austin, Texas, can call a ride immediately.
  iOS distribution is complete, while Android is being prepared through job postings, signaling progress.
• Despite the surge in users, wait times have actually decreased.
  This is interpreted as a signal of simultaneous fleet (vehicle) expansion, improvements in dispatch algorithms, and an expansion of operating zones (geofencing).
• The target for the Bay Area is set at 11,000 vehicles and 500 in Austin by the end of the year (based on the original text).
  This represents an operation that assumes a 30-40 fold expansion over a short period from the previous level of around 30 vehicles.
• An email approval for public road service in Arizona (based on the original text) has been confirmed.
  This is interpreted as a practical step that can reduce the gap between regulatory reports and stock price fluctuations.
• In Europe, there are claims (based on the original text) that the legal framework for an unsupervised version of FSD in the Czech Republic will be established from January 1, 2025, and in Norway, a rebound in Tesla deliveries has been observed.
• Waymo is opening regulatory doors by entering new cities (based on the original text), while Tesla can secure price competitiveness with low per-mile costs when entering cities later.
• Elon Musk mentioned an ‘Nvidia Moment’, presenting the first trigger for a valuation re-evaluation as the large-scale rollout of unsupervised autonomous driving, followed by the second trigger of mass production of Optimus (with Fremont’s plan for a system of 1 million units by 2026, based on the original text).
• While fear has grown in the market amid debates over an AI bubble versus a dot-com bubble, there is also the view that the spread of AI in the real world is just beginning.
  In the intersection of the global economic outlook and the re-evaluation of tech stocks, it is time to reassess AI investment strategies.

Why Is This a Turning Point — The Structure of the ‘Nvidia Moment’

When unsupervised autonomous driving is deployed on a large scale, the shift from a hardware sales company to a software and network revenue model accelerates.
As the per-mile cost decreases, both price reductions and market share expansion become achievable, and software subscriptions and robo-taxi revenue shares boost the overall margin.
This process leads to a re-evaluation of tech stock valuation multiples, and similar to an ‘Nvidia Moment’, the market level can be redefined based on future unit economics rather than current earnings.
From a macro perspective, as interest rates peak and inflation subsides, the contraction of discounts on growth stocks may lead to increased stock price resilience.

What Operational Data Tells Us — The Meaning of Reduced Wait Times

• If wait times decrease even amid a surge in demand, it suggests that supply (fleet) expansion and improved dispatch efficiency are in effect.
• A precise expansion of geofencing and the accumulation of intersection and lane-level data are activating a ‘data-operation’ flywheel that reduces the P90 wait time.
• The full-scale rollout of the app signals that KPI metrics such as DAU/MAU, dispatch rate relative to requests, churn rate, re-call rate, and session duration will be managed in earnest.
• As the proportion of removed safety drivers increases, Opex drops sharply, and the improvement in unit economics is directly transferred into price competitiveness.

RoboTaxi Unit Economics Snapshot (Based on Assumptions)

• Example cost structure: Energy (kWh/mi), insurance/accident reserves, maintenance/tires, depreciation (vehicle + compute), network, maps, cloud services, licensing/regulatory fees.
• According to the original text’s claim, Tesla’s per-mile cost may be more than 10 times lower than Waymo’s.
  The argument is that a camera-based system combined with large-scale OTA and its own chip/training stack lowers the cost curve.
• On the revenue side: the fee ($/mi) × paid driving miles × utilization (hours/day) × market share is key.
  When safety drivers are removed, labor cost savings allow the break-even mile to be reached quickly.
• From an investment perspective, once the per-mile cost drops below 50% of the fare, aggressive fare cuts and urban expansion can be pursued simultaneously, triggering a domino effect on market share.

Note: The figures above are based on general market assumptions and the gist of the original text rather than official disclosures.
Actual values may vary depending on regional regulations, insurance premiums, electricity costs, and accident rates.

Regulatory and Geographic Expansion Roadmap (Based on the Original Text)

• United States: News of an email approval from the Arizona Department of Transportation for public roads has been reported.
  Waymo’s expansion into new cities is setting a regulatory precedent as a “pioneer effect,” which could ease entry barriers for Tesla.
• Europe: Along with claims of an unsupervised FSD legal framework from January 1, 2025 in the Czech Republic, there is a growing demand for consumer-led regulatory relaxation.
  The rebound in Tesla deliveries in Norway suggests demand elasticity and improved production efficiency at Gigafactory Berlin.
• Verification Points: Check the status of permits by state/city, NHTSA/STATE DMV public notices, updates to UNECE regulations (such as R157), and changes in insurance underwriting guidelines.

App/Fleet Update Checklist

• App: iOS full-scale rollout, Android launch preparations (via job postings) signal progress.
• Fleet: Track the end-of-year targets of 11k vehicles in the Bay Area and 500 in Austin (based on the original text) along with actual utilization rates.
• Key KPIs: P50/P90 wait times, the proportion of removed safety drivers, safety events per mile, revenue mile proportion, speed of urban hub expansion, OTA frequency, and performance improvement.

Investor Perspective — AI Bubble vs. Dot-Com Bubble, and Positioning

Although over-exuberance and bursts in valuation, as seen in the dot-com bubble, tend to recur, long-term profits become opportunities if structural productivity improvements like those seen in the internet/cloud continue.
The focus of AI investment is shifting to “real-world AI that generates actual cash flow,” with robo-taxi being a prime example.
At the macro level, the trajectory of interest rates and the pace of inflation reduction directly influence tech stock multiples.
Strategically, phased buying, hedging against regulatory and safety issues, and adjusting positions based on the speed of unit economic improvements are effective.

Risk and Fact-Checking Points

• Regulatory Risk: City-level shutdowns may occur in the event of accidents or incidents.
• Supply Chain/Compute: There may be bottlenecks in the expansion of GPUs for training, power, or data centers.
• Competition: Cities may be pre-emptively occupied by Waymo, Cruise, or Chinese firms.
• Macro: If interest rates rise again or inflation accelerates, tech stock discounts could widen.
• Fact Check: This article is based on the provided original text and publicly available market information.
  Regularly check local regulatory bodies, app stores, and company disclosures for app rollouts, permits, and city-specific service statuses.

The Most Important Aspect Overlooked by Other YouTube Videos or News Outlets

• The reduction in wait times is not merely a matter of demand efficiency but the result of accumulating “city-road segmented data”.
  This is accompanied by a learning effect that exponentially lowers the probability of safety events, serving as key evidence to boost regulatory credibility.
• Per-mile costs determine pricing power.
  A cost-advantaged company can aggressively lower fares during city expansion, seizing network effects and thereby redefining long-term valuation multiples.
• An insurance underwriting data flywheel is set in motion.
  Tailored insurance premiums based on proprietary driving logs act as an additional source of margin, something competitors will find difficult to match in terms of data access.
• The fleet financing structure reduces sensitivity to interest rates.
  If an ABS (securitization) model based on autonomous driving cash flows is established, expansion will be possible even in a high interest rate environment.
• The energy-grid integration is a hidden growth engine.
  Cheap off-peak electricity and participation in demand response (DR) can further lower energy costs, thereby improving unit economics.

Optimus and the 2026 Scenario (Based on the Original Text)

If physical robots are commercialized en masse, such as with the Fremont 1 million unit system (based on the original text), labor productivity in manufacturing, logistics, and services will surge.
A structure in which robo-taxi cash generation leads to a recycling of investments into Optimus indicates that the mega-cycle of AI investment will be completed as it shifts from “software” to the “real world”.
At this stage, the key variables in the global economic outlook will be the interest rate path and the pace of regulatory changes, which could lead to a widespread re-evaluation of tech stock multiples.

Portfolio Action Checklist

• Set up a calendar for updates on regulatory disclosures and city-by-city permit statuses.
• Track app KPIs (DAU, wait times, proportion of driverless operation) on a monthly basis.
• Update the per-mile cost estimation model quarterly and perform sensitivity analysis on fares/utilization rates.
• Map out tech stock multiple scenarios based on changes in interest rates and inflation paths.
• Compare the speed of urban expansion and pricing strategies of Waymo/competitors.

In conclusion, the full-scale app rollout, improved wait times, and progress in urban permits signal that the stage has moved beyond demand validation to operational scaling.
When the transition to unsupervised driving becomes a reality, improved unit economics will simultaneously drive pricing power and a re-evaluation of valuation multiples, increasing the likelihood of an “Nvidia Moment”.
If the interest rate and inflation trajectories become favorable, a re-rating of tech stocks and an evolution in the AI investment cycle may occur.

< Summary >

The full-scale app rollout and progress in city permits (based on the original text) signal a shift from demand validation to operational scaling.
The reduction in wait times is the result of fleet expansion combined with improved dispatch efficiency, and unit economics will sharply improve with the transition to unsupervised operation.
A cost advantage per mile enables both pricing power and market share expansion, serving as a catalyst for valuation re-evaluation.
Emerging cracks in European regulations and Waymo’s pioneering role in opening regulatory doors lower entry barriers for Tesla.
If interest rates and inflation ease, the expansion of tech stock multiples and the AI investment cycle will further evolve, increasing the probability of an “Nvidia Moment”.

[Related Articles…]

• RoboTaxi Unit Economics and Tech Stock Re-evaluation: 2026 Global Economic Outlook
• Interest Rate Peak and AI Investment Cycle: Scenarios Beyond Inflation Easing

*Source: [ 허니잼의 테슬라와 일론 ]

– 테슬라 로보택시 누구나 탈 수 있게 확대를 시작했습니다!! 로보택시 아리조나 공도 허가! 테슬라의 엔비디아 모먼트를 언급한 일론 머스크. 공포와 함께 커지는 기회!

---

● Shipbuilding Goldrush – US Navy Outsourcing Sparks Korea Boom

Korean Shipbuilding Supercycle Gets Underway: US–Korea Defense Cooperation, Nuclear Submarine Ripple Effects, 2026 Investment Checkpoints, and AI/Robot Variables Summarized

This article covers the passage and timeline of the US Navy’s overseas construction allowance bill, the profitability structure and multiple expansion conditions of the vessels, the real significance of the nuclear-powered submarine project, the manpower/robot/AI implementation plans of Korean shipyards, and the selection criteria for shipbuilding and equipment stocks in 2026—all in one go.

Even amidst interest rate and exchange rate volatility, inflation, and recession risks, this piece neatly outlines whether defense demands can decouple from the cycle and what kind of cash generation energy transition (LNG/FLNG) may create.

1) News Summary: What is Happening Now?

The prevailing view is that the shipbuilding industry has entered its third supercycle.

Since 2008, a prolonged downturn forced the exit of many global shipyards, structurally reducing supply, and the surviving major players have regained pricing power.

This cycle is centered on high-value commercial vessels such as LNG carriers, large container ships, and ultra-large crude carriers, as opposed to the past focus on bulk carriers.

In addition, heightened geopolitical risks have added demand for defense (vessels), creating a dual momentum driven by commercial and defense sectors.

The United States is keen to utilize the shipbuilding capabilities of its allies to rapidly close the gap with the Chinese and Russian navies.

Although domestic construction in the US may be less profitable due to labor, material, and manpower challenges, margins could surge when production is carried out at Korean shipyards.

2) Is Defense Lucrative? Profitability Structure by the Numbers

HD Hyundai Heavy Industries’ special vessel OPM recorded 13.8% in Q3.

Sixty percent of its revenue during the same period came from domestic orders (with low margins of around 5%), and 40% from overseas orders.

This implies that the margin for overseas defense vessels is estimated to be around 25%.

Since US Navy vessel unit prices are even higher, production at Korean yards holds further potential for margin improvements.

3) Nuclear-Powered Submarine Issue: The ‘Symbolic Meaning’ is More Important Than Scale

The nuclear-powered submarines desired by Korea are based on Low Enriched Uranium (LEU), using the French Barracuda class as a reference.

At around 2–2.5 trillion KRW per vessel, assuming 10 vessels, the total scale is estimated to be in the 10 trillion KRW range.

However, when compared to Canada’s submarine project (Team Korea’s challenge) which is valued at 60 trillion KRW, the domestic nuclear project alone cannot explain the supercycle.

The key is that the US is opening the LEU domain to Korea as a “political and security signal.”

This indicates that the modernization of the US Navy is urgent and connects to the strategy of fully integrating Korean and Japanese shipbuilding capabilities into the global supply chain.

4) Legal and Institutional Checkpoints: Prerequisites for Multiple Expansion

The Ships America Act (US Shipbuilding Rebuilding Bill, introduced with bipartisan support) marks the starting point for budget execution.

The Ensuring Naval Readiness Act, introduced in both the House and Senate, is known to allow some components like hulls and blocks of US Navy vessels to be built at overseas shipyards.

The key is to change the relevant provisions of 10 U.S.C. (which currently restrict overseas construction).

If these bills are passed, the system allowing Korean shipyards to build US vessels will open institutionally, and multiple expansion will be fully activated.

Although there could be delays in the congressional schedule, the prevailing view is that passage is highly likely due to bipartisan support and national interest.

5) Global Competitive Landscape: Who is Really Excelling?

Europe: Strong players include Germany’s TKMS (submarine expert), France’s Naval Group, Italy’s Fincantieri, the UK’s BAE Systems, and Sweden’s Saab, among others.

Asia: Japan’s MHI and Kawasaki also boast high competitiveness in vessels.

Europe is likely to focus on absorbing domestic and NATO demand, which could leave room for opportunities for Korea in global orders.

In vessel orders, delivery time is the top priority over price, and a comprehensive score of technology, financial safety, and even government-to-government diplomacy is critical.

6) China vs USA: The Axial Gap and the US Choice

Based on the axial dimension, the Chinese navy has overtaken the US since around 2015, and the gap is widening.

The US is experiencing slow new builds due to manpower shortages and the burden of maintaining aging vessels.

To narrow this gap, leveraging the high-quality production capabilities of Korea and Japan appears to be the most realistic scenario.

7) Production Capacity of Korean Shipbuilding: How Far Have We Come with Manpower, Robots, and AI?

The gap left by aging skilled workers is being supplemented by an increase in foreign technical personnel.

Major shipyards have shown an improvement in productivity by 10–15% compared to plans.

While robots are rapidly increasing in repetitive processes such as flat panel welding, tasks involving curved surfaces, confined spaces, and precision welding still rely heavily on human labor.

HD Hyundai has activated a roadmap with Palantir: Digital Twin (Phase 1 completed) → AI (Phase 2 in progress) → Autonomous operations based on robots (Phase 3, targeted by the end of 2027).

Even though full automation remains difficult, the increased incorporation of AI and robots is expected to underpin improvements in delivery schedules and cost reduction, thereby enhancing profitability.

Expansion of docks remains very conservative due to memories of the financial crisis, and the strategy of “maximizing profitability under limited supply” continues to be maintained.

Gunsan shipyards are gradually reinforcing the ecosystem through partial operations such as block construction.

8) Why Samsung Heavy Industries is Gaining Attention: FLNG Super Leverage

Samsung Heavy Industries does not have a defense segment but holds overwhelming track records in the FLNG field within offshore plants.

With projects valued at around 2–2.5 billion USD each and margins exceeding 15–20%, a high-profit portfolio is established.

As LNG reemerges during the energy transition, the FLNG order pipeline is driving a re-rating of its stock.

9) Hanwha Ocean × Samsung Heavy Industries M&A Scenario: Synergy vs. Regulation

In terms of synergy, the combination of defense (Hanwha) and offshore plants (Samsung) is powerful.

Proximity of the Geoje/Tongyeong yards allows for logistics optimization.

However, there are significant risks from global monopoly review regulations, and issues such as capital increases could lead to short-term stock volatility.

10) 2026 Investment Checkpoints: What to Look For

Bill Timeline: The priority is to check whether the Ships America Act and the Ensuring Naval Readiness Act are passed, as well as the detailed implementation (scope and rate of overseas construction allowance).

Delivery Capability: For large overseas defense orders, verifying the delivery commitments and production turnaround speed of Korean yards is crucial.

Mix Changes: As the proportion of defense and offshore sectors increases relative to commercial vessels, there is greater potential for improved profitability.

FLNG Pipeline: Monitor LNG prices, project financing, EPC progress, and variable interest rate borrowing costs (interest rates).

Cost Variables: Consider the impact of steel and specialty steel prices, exchange rates, and inflation on total costs and hedging profits/losses.

Manpower, Robots, and AI: Assess the progress of automation around 2027 and the corresponding productivity KPIs.

Equipment Differentiation: Given the scarcity of listed equipment companies engaged in defense business models, note the potential for multiple separation as commercial vessel-dominated equipment may decouple in multiples.

11) Portfolio Ideas (General Information)

Large Shipbuilding: Companies with an order backlog of over three years, benefiting from an increased mix of high-value commercial vessels, defense, and offshore sectors.

Offshore Plant Specialists: Focus on companies with proven capabilities in FLNG and FPSO projects.

Defense Value Chain: Integrated defense, combat systems, sensors, gas turbines, and key module collaborators.

Equipment: Check the turnover of orders, the mix of defense vs. offshore sectors, and the length of order backlogs, while volatility should be managed for businesses solely focused on the commercial sector.

This content is general industry information and is not a specific recommendation to buy or sell any stock.

12) Risks and Headwinds

Bill Rejection/Delay: Due to congressional scheduling and political factors in the US, the timeline for multiple expansion may be delayed.

Forced Domestic Production in the US: If the proportion of US-based construction increases, margins for Korean companies could be limited.

Reduction in Price/Cost Spread: Rising steel prices, wages, and abrupt exchange rate movements can pressure cost ratios.

Global Order Cycle Slowdown: In the event of a deepening recession, orders for commercial vessels may be adjusted, although defense is more likely to decouple from the cycle.

AI & Robot Trend Points

Digital Twin + AI enables process simulation and real-time monitoring of costs and delivery schedules.

Automation in robotic welding and cutting is expanding, which shortens the cycle time of bottleneck processes.

AI-based optimization of batching and material flow can boost dock turnover, improving revenue and margins within the same capacity.

The One Key Point Often Overlooked in Other YouTube Videos or News

The true switch for the 2026 shipbuilding multiple expansion is the “scope and ratio of US Navy overseas construction allowance.” Before the passage of the bill, the valuation gap may widen between equipment sectors and shipbuilding stocks because the equipment sector is dominated by commercial vessels.

Fine Points Q&A

Q. Will the gap between the US and China narrow?

A. Although China maintains an edge in terms of axial dimensions, the United States is likely to balance this with superior quality, networks, and allied production systems.

Q. Is there nothing left if production is done domestically in the US?

A. Short-term margins may be low, but results depend on the design of laws, tax incentives, and outsourcing proportions.

Q. What about expanding the docks?

A. It is very limited.

The basic strategy is to respond with supply restraint and automation efficiency.

Conclusion: The Meaning of “Next Year is the Last Buying Opportunity”

Profit improvements in the commercial sector have already become visible, and stock prices have been partially priced in.

Further re-rating will come from defense, bill passage, and offshore (FLNG) sectors.

Therefore, in 2026, the strategy is to check for bill passage → confirmation of the overseas construction allowance scope → verification of delivery advantages, and then focus on companies with increasing defense and offshore mixes.

Although interest rate, exchange rate, and inflation volatility will persist, defense demand in this cycle partly bypasses the economic cycle.

< Summary >

The third Korean shipbuilding supercycle is driven simultaneously by high-value commercial vessels and defense.

The profitability booster is the passage and details of the US shipbuilding rebuilding and overseas construction allowance bills.

Defense margins at Korean yards could reach 25% or more.

FLNG is confirmed as Samsung Heavy Industries’ structural strength with high margins.

Robots and AI will be significantly implemented around 2027, improving both delivery and cost efficiency.

The equipment sector may experience multiple differentiation depending on the presence of a defense business model.

[Related Articles…]

• 10 Investment Checkpoints for the Shipbuilding Supercycle
• US Navy Overseas Construction Allowance Bill and Its Impact on Korean Shipbuilding

*Source: [ Jun’s economy lab ]

– 조선주 내년이 마지막 매수 기회입니다(ft.한승한 연구원 1부)

---