Recently, news of a Tesla Cybertruck crashing while running Full Self-Driving (FSD) software V13.2.4 has become a hot topic. The accident, where the vehicle failed to properly change lanes, was shared on social media by Florida-based software developer Jonathan Challinger, bringing the issue to widespread attention. This incident serves as a crucial reminder of the current limitations of Tesla's FSD and necessitates a re-evaluation of consumer expectations regarding autonomous driving.
1. Summary of the Accident
1-1. Accident Circumstances
- While FSD was activated, the Cybertruck, in the right lane which was ending, was supposed to merge into the left lane but failed to recognize the need, resulting in it hitting a curb.
- Subsequently, the vehicle collided with a nearby lamppost, leading to the accident.
- Fortunately, the driver was unharmed, but the vehicle sustained unavoidable damage.
1-2. Driver's Reaction
- Jonathan Challinger acknowledged his own negligence, warning that "drivers must always remain vigilant even when using FSD."
- This highlights the fact that despite Tesla's claims that autonomous driving is evolving into a "fully autonomous" technology, continuous human supervision is currently necessary.
2. The Current State and Limitations of Tesla FSD
2-1. The Gap Between FSD's Name and Actual Functionality
Tesla is pursuing technological development under the vision of achieving "full autonomous driving" through FSD, with Elon Musk promoting FSD as increasingly "approaching perfection." However, currently, FSD remains at the level of an Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), handling functions such as acceleration and lane changes.
- The FSD V13 version aims for high accuracy in merging lanes, interrupted roads, and various driving scenarios, but errors still persist.
2-2. Data and Reality
- Tesla's internal reports claim that FSD helps reduce accidents compared to human drivers, but there is a lack of independent and objective data to support this claim.
- Elon Musk and Tesla-related influencers tend to consistently emphasize only the positive aspects of FSD, downplaying the problems.
3. Precautions for Tesla Users Regarding FSD
3-1. The Driver's Role
- At this point, continuous driving observation and intervention by the driver are essential for FSD. The misleading implication of "full autonomy" in the name can lead to excessive reliance on the technology, which can result in dangerous situations.
- Drivers should monitor the system's operation in scenarios such as ending lanes, narrow roads, and complex intersections.
3-2. Tips for Accident Prevention
- 🛑 Always Carefully Check Road Conditions: Maintain vigilance to enable immediate intervention in case of FSD malfunction.
- ⚠️ Maintain Speed and Following Distance: Follow accurate safe driving rules instead of relying solely on technology.
- 🤝 FSD Updates and Learning: Learn about new features and potential limitations with each update to prepare accordingly.
4. Overall Implications and Conclusion
Tesla's FSD represents technological progress, but it remains at a stage where human role and responsibility are strongly required. Elon Musk's marketing may create excessive expectations, contributing to increased potential accident risks.
Key Conclusion
- Tesla FSD is significant in experimenting with technological advancements targeting "early adopters."
- However, currently, it should be used as a driver assistance system rather than aiming for full autonomous driving, and drivers are still not exempt from driving responsibilities.
We need to continuously review the safety and efficiency of using new technologies through updates and reviews related to FSD. 🛡️
*Source URL:
https://electrek.co/2025/02/09/tesla-cybertruck-crash-on-full-self-driving-v13-goes-viral/
Leave a Reply